Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26289041›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2015

POPE: post optimization posterior evaluation of likelihood free models.

Edward Meeds, Michael Chiang, Mary Lee, Olivier Cinquin, John Lowengrub, Max Welling

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Edward MeedsInformatics Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. E.W.F.Meeds@uva.nl.
Michael ChiangSchool of Biological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, USA. mcah5a@gmail.com.
Mary LeeDepartment of Mathematics, University of California, Irvine, USA. mary.lee@uci.edu.
Olivier CinquinSchool of Biological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, USA. olivier.cinquin@uci.edu.
John LowengrubDepartment of Mathematics, University of California, Irvine, USA. lowengrb@math.uci.edu.
Max WellingInformatics Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. welling.max@gmail.com.

Funding

Univ.of Calif., Irvine Cancer Center Support GrantP30CA062203 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI Melanie Funes · 1994 to 2026
$57.9M
Uncover Strategies Used By Biological SystemsP50GM076516 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI NIE, QING · 2007 to 2016
$25.1M
Control of cell cycling speed to delay the onset of senescenceR01GM102635 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI CINQUIN, OLIVIER · 2012 to 2016
$1.4M
Direct tests of the role of stem cells in minimizing mutation accumulationR21AG042125 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI CINQUIN, OLIVIER · 2012 to 2013
$396k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA062203NCI NIH HHS P30-CA062203NIA NIH HHS R21 AG042125NIA NIH HHS R21-AG42125NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM076516NIGMS NIH HHS P50-GM76516NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM102635NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM102635
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn many domains, scientists build complex simulators of natural phenomena that encode their hypotheses about the underlying processes. These simulators can be deterministic or stochastic, fast or slow, constrained or unconstrained, and so on. Optimizing the simulators with respect to a set of parameter values is common practice, resulting in a single parameter setting that minimizes an objective subject to constraints.

resultsWe propose algorithms for post optimization posterior evaluation (POPE) of simulators. The algorithms compute and visualize all simulations that can generate results of the same or better quality than the optimum, subject to constraints. These optimization posteriors are desirable for a number of reasons among which are easy interpretability, automatic parameter sensitivity and correlation analysis, and posterior predictive analysis. Our algorithms are simple extensions to an existing simulation-based inference framework called approximate Bayesian computation. POPE is applied two biological simulators: a fast and stochastic simulator of stem-cell cycling and a slow and deterministic simulator of tumor growth patterns.

conclusionsPOPE allows the scientist to explore and understand the role that constraints, both on the input and the output, have on the optimization posterior. As a Bayesian inference procedure, POPE provides a rigorous framework for the analysis of the uncertainty of an optimal simulation parameter setting.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsComputer SimulationModels, TheoreticalStem Cell NicheBayes TheoremColonic NeoplasmsHumansNeoplastic Stem CellsProbabilitySignal TransductionStochastic Processes

Identifiers

PMID26289041
PMCPMC4545973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.