ArticleJournal of healthcare engineering2015
Usability of a Wearable Camera System for Dementia Family Caregivers.
Article in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- What evidence supports the use of Body Worn Cameras in mental health inpatient wards? A systematic review and narrative synthesis of the effects of Body Worn Cameras in public sector services.International journal of mental health nursing · 2022Pooled it
- Review of Technology-Supported Multimodal Solutions for People with Dementia.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Pooled it
- "It's Like a Cyber-Security Blanket": The Utility of Remote Activity Monitoring in Family Dementia Care.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2020Trial
- Six-Month Effectiveness of Remote Activity Monitoring for Persons Living With Dementia and Their Family Caregivers: An Experimental Mixed Methods Study.The Gerontologist · 2019Trial
- Acceptance and Privacy Perceptions Toward Video-based Active and Assisted Living Technologies: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- Wearable Activity Tracker Use and Physical Activity Among Informal Caregivers in the United States: Quantitative Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2022Article
- Smart Environments and Social Robots for Age-Friendly Integrated Care Services.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Review
- Article
- Acceptability of a lifelogging wearable camera in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: a mixed-method study.BMC geriatrics · 2019Article
- [Caregiver intervention studies : Recommendations on endpoints and outcome measures for cognitively impaired care recipients].Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2018Article
- Mapping Movement: Applying Motion Measurement Technologies to the Psychiatric Care of Older Adults.Current psychiatry reports · 2018Review
- Views of individuals with spinal cord injury on the use of wearable cameras to monitor upper limb function in the home and community.The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2017Article
- Wearable Technology to Garner the Perspective of Dementia Family Caregivers.Journal of gerontological nursing · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Health care providers typically rely on family caregivers (CG) of persons with dementia (PWD) to describe difficult behaviors manifested by their underlying disease. Although invaluable, such reports may be selective or biased during brief medical encounters. Our team explored the usability of a wearable camera system with 9 caregiving dyads (CGs: 3 males, 6 females, 67.00 ± 14.95 years; PWDs: 2 males, 7 females, 80.00 ± 3.81 years, MMSE 17.33 ± 8.86) who recorded 79 salient events over a combined total of 140 hours of data capture, from 3 to 7 days of wear per CG. Prior to using the system, CGs assessed its benefits to be worth the invasion of privacy; post-wear privacy concerns did not differ significantly. CGs rated the system easy to learn to use, although cumbersome and obtrusive. Few negative reactions by PWDs were reported or evident in resulting video. Our findings suggest that CGs can and will wear a camera system to reveal their daily caregiving challenges to health care providers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.