Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26288849›Full record

ArticleEBioMedicine2015

Ocular pseudoexfoliation syndrome and life span.

Jon Klokk Slettedal, Leiv Sandvik, Amund Ringvold

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EBioMedicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Exfoliation syndrome: association with systemic diseases-the Maccabi glaucoma study.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Pseudoexfoliation syndrome: analysis of systemic comorbidities of 325 PEX-positive patients compared with 911 PEX-negative patients.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jon Klokk SlettedalInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway ; Department of Ophthalmology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Leiv SandvikOslo Center for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Oslo University Hospital, Norway.
Amund RingvoldInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway.
University of Oslo · NOOslo University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo compare life span of persons with and without ocular pseudoexfoliation syndrome (PES).

methodsThe study is based on an epidemiological survey conducted in Sør-Trøndelag county, Norway, in 1985-86. All inhabitants over 64 years of age (2109 individuals) were invited. Mortality information was obtained from The Norwegian Institute of Public Health in 2014, by which time 99% of the participants were deceased.

resultsWhen adjusting for age and gender, life span was not statistically different in persons with and without PES. Following the diagnosis of PES, patients' survival was up to, and beyond, 30 years.

conclusionsOur observations suggest that, despite all the systemic aberrations reported in persons with ocular PES, none or only marginal functional changes are caused in extraocular organs and tissues. The present study supports the notion that systemic PES is not a life-threatening condition.

Indexed as

LongevityAgedAged, 80 and overExfoliation SyndromeHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateNorwayPrevalenceCardiovascular diseaseEyeLife spanMortalityOphthalmologyPseudoexfoliation syndromeSurvey

Identifiers

PMID26288849
PMCPMC4534680
OpenAlexW1830536659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.