Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26288753›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2015

Predicting the laterality of temporal lobe epilepsy from PET, MRI, and DTI: A multimodal study.

Dorian Pustina, Brian Avants, Michael Sperling, Richard Gorniak, Xiaosong He, Gaelle Doucet, Paul Barnett, Scott Mintzer, Ashwini Sharan, Joseph Tracy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Multi-modal cross-domain self-supervised pre-training for fMRI and EEG fusion.Neural networks : the official journal of the International Neural Network Society · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Combined [European radiology · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Combined quantitative T2 mapping and [European radiology · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. QuantitativeEpilepsy & behavior : E&B · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Dorian PustinaDepartment of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Brian AvantsDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Michael SperlingDepartment of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University/Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
Richard GorniakDepartment of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University/Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
Xiaosong HeDepartment of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University/Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
Gaelle DoucetDepartment of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University/Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
Paul BarnettDepartment of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University/Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
Scott MintzerDepartment of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University/Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
Ashwini SharanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, USA.
Joseph TracyDepartment of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University/Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA ; Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University/Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.

Funding

Identify abnormal neurocognitive circuits in temporal lobe epilepsyR21NS056071 · NINDS · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI TRACY, JOSEPH I. · 2007 to 2008
$373k
NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS056071NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS056071-01A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pre-surgical evaluation of patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) relies on information obtained from multiple neuroimaging modalities. The relationship between modalities and their combined power in predicting the seizure focus is currently unknown. We investigated asymmetries from three different modalities, PET (glucose metabolism), MRI (cortical thickness), and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI; white matter anisotropy) in 28 left and 30 right TLE patients (LTLE and RTLE). Stepwise logistic regression models were built from each modality separately and from all three combined, while bootstrapped methods and split-sample validation verified the robustness of predictions. Among all multimodal asymmetries, three PET asymmetries formed the best predictive model (100% success in full sample, >95% success in split-sample validation). The combinations of PET with other modalities did not perform better than PET alone. Probabilistic classifications were obtained for new clinical cases, which showed correct lateralization for 7/7 new TLE patients (100%) and for 4/5 operated patients with discordant or non-informative PET reports (80%). Metabolism showed closer relationship with white matter in LTLE and closer relationship with gray matter in RTLE. Our data suggest that metabolism is a powerful modality that can predict seizure laterality with high accuracy, and offers high value for automated predictive models. The side of epileptogenic focus can affect the relationship of metabolism with brain structure. The data and tools necessary to obtain classifications for new TLE patients are made publicly available.

Indexed as

AdultBrainBrain MappingDiffusion Tensor ImagingEpilepsy, Temporal LobeFemaleFunctional LateralityHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMultimodal ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyRegression AnalysisAsymmetryClassificationMachine learningMetabolismResection

Identifiers

PMID26288753
PMCPMC4536304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.