Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26288719›Full record

ArticleFood science & nutrition2015

In vitro evaluation of digestive and endolysosomal enzymes to cleave CML-modified Ara h 1 peptides.

Christopher P Mattison, Jens Dinter, Matthew J Berberich, Si-Yin Chung, Shawndrika S Reed, Sylvie Le Gall, Casey C Grimm

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food science & nutrition, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher P MattisonUnited States Department of Agriculture - Agricultural Research Service - Southern Regional Research Center 1100 Robert E. Lee Blvd., New Orleans, Louisiana, 70124.
Jens DinterRagon Institute of MGH, MIT and Harvard 400 Technology Square, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02139 ; Harvard Medical School Boston, Massachusetts.
Matthew J BerberichRagon Institute of MGH, MIT and Harvard 400 Technology Square, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02139.
Si-Yin ChungUnited States Department of Agriculture - Agricultural Research Service - Southern Regional Research Center 1100 Robert E. Lee Blvd., New Orleans, Louisiana, 70124.
Shawndrika S ReedUnited States Department of Agriculture - Agricultural Research Service - Southern Regional Research Center 1100 Robert E. Lee Blvd., New Orleans, Louisiana, 70124.
Sylvie Le GallRagon Institute of MGH, MIT and Harvard 400 Technology Square, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02139 ; Harvard Medical School Boston, Massachusetts.
Casey C GrimmUnited States Department of Agriculture - Agricultural Research Service - Southern Regional Research Center 1100 Robert E. Lee Blvd., New Orleans, Louisiana, 70124.
United States Department of Agriculture · USRagon Institute of MGH, MIT and Harvard · USAgricultural Research Service · USHarvard University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ara h 1 is a major peanut allergen. Processing-induced modifications may modulate the allergenic potency of Ara h 1. Carboxymethyl lysine (CML) modifications are a commonly described nonenzymatic modification on food proteins. In the current study, we tested the ability of digestive and endolysosomal proteases to cleave CML-modified and unmodified Ara h 1 peptides. Mass spectrometric analyses of the digested peptides demonstrate that carboxymethylation of lysine residues renders these peptides refractory to trypsin digestion. We did not detect observable differences in the simulated gastric fluid or endolysosomal digestion between the parental and CML-modified peptides. One of the tested peptides contains a lysine residue previously shown to be CML modified laying in a previously mapped linear IgE epitope, but we did not observe a difference in IgE binding between the modified and parental peptides. Our findings suggest a molecular mechanism for the increased resistance of peanut allergens modified by thermal processing, such as Ara h 1, to digestion in intestinal fluid after heating and could help explain how food processing-induced modifications may lead to more potent food allergens by acting to protect intact IgE epitopes from digestion by proteases targeting lysine residues.

Indexed as

Ara h 1carboxymethyl lysineMaillard reactionmass spectrometrypeptideproteolysis

Identifiers

PMID26288719
PMCPMC4534154
OpenAlexW2025408117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.