Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26288598›Full record

ReviewViszeralmedizin2014

Is There Any Evidence for a Role of Local Treatment in Cholangiocarcinoma?

Arndt Vogel, Oliver Dudeck

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Viszeralmedizin, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Arndt VogelDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany.
Oliver DudeckDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEUniversity Hospital Magdeburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost cholangiocarcinomas (CCA) are locally advanced and unresectable at the time of diagnosis. Currently, chemotherapy combining gemcitabine with a platinum agent is the recommended first-line treatment regimen for advanced biliary tract cancer. However, median overall survival is only approximately 1 year. As the hepatic tumor burden is the limiting factor for the prognosis of these patients, local tumor control is essential.

methodsWe present and discuss the current evidence for such therapy options for patients with CCA.

resultsLocal and locoregional therapies have been shown to be well tolerated and can contribute to tumor control in the context of a comprehensive oncologic treatment strategy, and may prolong survival of patients with advanced CCA. Unfortunately, only few high-quality clinical trials are available.

conclusionRandomized prospective clinical trials enrolling larger numbers of patients need to be carried out to elucidate the precise value of these treatments alone as well as in combination with systemic chemotherapy.

Indexed as

CholangiocarcinomaInterventionLocal therapyLocoregional therapy

Identifiers

PMID26288598
PMCPMC4513809
OpenAlexW2087362291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.