ReviewViszeralmedizin2014
Epidemiology of Colorectal Adenomas and Histopathological Assessment of Endoscopic Specimens in the Colorectum.
Review in Viszeralmedizin, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Descriptive epidemiological study of South African colorectal cancer patients at a Johannesburg Hospital Academic institution.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2020Article
- Mass screening for colorectal cancer in a population of two million older adults in Guangzhou, China.Scientific reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundColorectal cancer is one of the most frequently observed neoplasms in the world. It develops from intraepithelial neoplasia of the colorectal mucosa, and these precursor lesions are also known as adenoma. As the precursor lesion is known and can be detected easily, efficient screening strategies are available for a reliable prevention of colorectal adenocarcinoma, e.g. by colonoscopy.
methodsLiterature databases (PubMed) were searched selectively for the keywords 'colorectal adenoma', 'epidemiology', and 'resection techniques'. The results are presented in the following text, also taking into account our own experience and the current S3 guidelines.
resultsEndoscopic resection samples are one of the specimens most frequently assessed by pathologists. Therefore, gastroenterologists expect standardized and well-structured pathology reports, stating relevant information concerning the removed lesions and recommendations for clinical management. These aspects are summarized in the evidence-based S3 guideline.
conclusionAs a consequence of colorectal adenoma resection during screening procedures, the carcinoma incidence is decreasing. For further advancements in successful prevention, knowledge of different precursor lesions (conventional adenoma, serrated adenoma) is important, but also structured communication between the different disciplines engaged in colorectal cancer screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.