Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26287743›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Development of Genomic Microsatellite Markers in Carthamus tinctorius L. (Safflower) Using Next Generation Sequencing and Assessment of Their Cross-Species Transferability and Utility for Diversity Analysis.

Heena Ambreen, Shivendra Kumar, Murali Tottekkad Variath, Gopal Joshi, Sapinder Bali, Manu Agarwal, Amar Kumar, Arun Jagannath, Shailendra Goel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Evolution ofPhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2020
    Article
  13. Development of EST-SSR markers inJournal of genetics · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Molecular diversity assessment of a world collection of safflower genotypes by SRAP and SCoT molecular markers.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Heena AmbreenDepartment of Botany, University of Delhi, Delhi, 110007, India.
Shivendra KumarDepartment of Botany, University of Delhi, Delhi, 110007, India.
Murali Tottekkad VariathDepartment of Botany, University of Delhi, Delhi, 110007, India.
Gopal JoshiDepartment of Botany, University of Delhi, Delhi, 110007, India.
Sapinder BaliDepartment of Botany, University of Delhi, Delhi, 110007, India.
Manu AgarwalDepartment of Botany, University of Delhi, Delhi, 110007, India.
Amar KumarDepartment of Botany, University of Delhi, Delhi, 110007, India.
Arun JagannathDepartment of Botany, University of Delhi, Delhi, 110007, India.
Shailendra GoelDepartment of Botany, University of Delhi, Delhi, 110007, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSafflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.), an Asteraceae member, yields high quality edible oil rich in unsaturated fatty acids and is resilient to dry conditions. The crop holds tremendous potential for improvement through concerted molecular breeding programs due to the availability of significant genetic and phenotypic diversity. Genomic resources that could facilitate such breeding programs remain largely underdeveloped in the crop. The present study was initiated to develop a large set of novel microsatellite markers for safflower using next generation sequencing. PRINCIPAL

findingsLow throughput genome sequencing of safflower was performed using Illumina paired end technology providing ~3.5X coverage of the genome. Analysis of sequencing data allowed identification of 23,067 regions harboring perfect microsatellite loci. The safflower genome was found to be rich in dinucleotide repeats followed by tri-, tetra-, penta- and hexa-nucleotides. Primer pairs were designed for 5,716 novel microsatellite sequences with repeat length ≥ 20 bases and optimal flanking regions. A subset of 325 microsatellite loci was tested for amplification, of which 294 loci produced robust amplification. The validated primers were used for assessment of 23 safflower accessions belonging to diverse agro-climatic zones of the world leading to identification of 93 polymorphic primers (31.6%). The numbers of observed alleles at each locus ranged from two to four and mean polymorphism information content was found to be 0.3075. The polymorphic primers were tested for cross-species transferability on nine wild relatives of cultivated safflower. All primers except one showed amplification in at least two wild species while 25 primers amplified across all the nine species. The UPGMA dendrogram clustered C. tinctorius accessions and wild species separately into two major groups. The proposed progenitor species of safflower, C. oxyacantha and C. palaestinus were genetically closer to cultivated safflower and formed a distinct cluster. The cluster analysis also distinguished diploid and tetraploid wild species of safflower.

conclusionNext generation sequencing of safflower genome generated a large set of microsatellite markers. The novel markers developed in this study will add to the existing repertoire of markers and can be used for diversity analysis, synteny studies, construction of linkage maps and marker-assisted selection.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingBase SequenceCarthamus tinctoriusCluster AnalysisDNA, PlantGenome, PlantGenotypeHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMicrosatellite RepeatsPlant BreedingPolymorphism, GeneticSequence Analysis, DNADNA, Plant

Identifiers

PMID26287743
PMCPMC4545945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.