ArticleMedicine2015
Do Recent Advances in Diagnostic and Therapeutic Procedures Negate the Benefit of Postmastectomy Radiotherapy in N1 Patients With a Low Risk of Locoregional Recurrence?
Article in Medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Can radiotherapy be omitted in T1-2N1 breast cancer patients after mastectomy without neoadjuvant therapy?Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Effect of post-mastectomy radiation therapy on survival in breast cancer with lymph nodes micrometastases: a meta-analysis and systematic review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Postmastectomy radiotherapy in patients with TJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Pooled it
- Ten-Year Survival after Postmastectomy Chest-Wall Irradiation in Breast Cancer.The New England journal of medicine · 2025Trial
- Article
- Evaluation of the 8th edition of the American joint committee on cancer's pathological staging system in prognosis assessment and treatment decision making for stage T1-2N1 breast cancer after mastectomy.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2020Article
- Real-world impact of postmastectomy radiotherapy in T1-2 breast cancer with one to three positive lymph nodes.Annals of translational medicine · 2020Article
- Axillary Lymph Node Dissection Does Not Improve Post-mastectomy Overall or Disease-Free Survival among Breast Cancer Patients with 1-3 Positive Nodes.Cancer research and treatment · 2019Article
- Local and regional recurrence following mastectomy in breast cancer patients with 1-3 positive nodes: implications for postmastectomy radiotherapy volume.Radiation oncology journal · 2018Article
- Article
- Postmastectomy Radiotherapy in Patients with pT1-2N1 Breast Cancer Treated with Taxane-Based Chemotherapy: A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis (KROG 1418).Cancer research and treatment · 2017Article
- Meeting Highlights: The Second Consensus Conference for Breast Cancer Treatment in Korea.Journal of breast cancer · 2017Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent advances in breast cancer management might make the use of postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) redundant in the treatment of pT1/T2N1 patients. We investigated the impact of PMRT on disease-free survival (DFS) in these patients who have a low risk of locoregional recurrence (LRR) after contemporary multidisciplinary management.Between 1998 and 2011, 1123 patients underwent upfront surgery for pathologically diagnosed pT1/T2N1 breast cancer, at a single institution. A retrospective review was performed on 692 patients who had a mastectomy with axillary lymph node (LN) clearance. Most patients received adjuvant systemic chemotherapy and/or endocrine therapy. PMRT was administered to 17.8% of the patients. The median follow-up time was 98 months.The entire cohort was divided into 2 groups, the early-era (1998-2003) and late-era (2004-2011) cohorts. Grouping was based on the use of modern therapies since 2004 including sentinel LN (SLN) biopsy, anthracycline/taxane-based chemotherapy, and aromatase inhibitors. Late-era patients had a significantly lower 5-year LRR compared with early-era patients (3.2% vs 10.3%, respectively; P < 0.001). In late-era patients, although PMRT did not significantly reduce the 5-year LRR rate (1% vs 3.8%, respectively), it did improve the 5-year DFS rate (96.1% vs 87.5%, respectively). After controlling for all clinicopathological variables, PMRT was independently associated with improved DFS. In subgroup analysis, depending on the presence of micro- or macrometastasis in the axillary nodes, the benefit of PMRT was most apparent in patients with macrometastasis (hazard ratio, 0.19). In the late-era cohort with no PMRT, the 3-year distant metastasis risk increased according to LN tumor burden (0%, 5.2%, and 9.8% in micrometastasis, SLN macrometastasis, and non-SLN macrometastasis, respectively).Advanced surgical and systemic therapies might not negate the benefit of PMRT in recently diagnosed pN1 patients who have a very low risk for LRR. Our data indicate that the overall recurrence risk combined with the LRR should be considered for an indication of PMRT, and raises the question of whether the receipt of PMRT would improve outcome in patients with micrometastasis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.