Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26286916›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2016

Stimulus Load and Oscillatory Activity in Higher Cortex.

Simon Kornblith, Timothy J Buschman, Earl K Miller

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04986787 (Novel, Individualized Brain Stimulation, Network-based Approaches to Improve Cognition in Healthy Seniors and Patients With MCI), which is not on this map. Cited by 51 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04986787 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Novel, Individualized Brain Stimulation, Network-based Approaches to Improve Cognition in Healthy Seniors and Patients With MCI

TypeinterventionalSponsorMasaryk UniversityRan2021 to 2023Enrolled160ConditionsMild Cognitive Impairment, Healthy AgingArmstACS, TMS, TIS
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Simon KornblithDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, The Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Timothy J BuschmanDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, The Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA.
Earl K MillerDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, The Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.

Funding

Capacity Limitations in the CortexR01MH091174 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI MILLER, EARL K · 2011 to 2015
$2.0M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH091174
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exploring and exploiting a rich visual environment requires perceiving, attending, and remembering multiple objects simultaneously. Recent studies have suggested that this mental "juggling" of multiple objects may depend on oscillatory neural dynamics. We recorded local field potentials from the lateral intraparietal area, frontal eye fields, and lateral prefrontal cortex while monkeys maintained variable numbers of visual stimuli in working memory. Behavior suggested independent processing of stimuli in each hemifield. During stimulus presentation, higher-frequency power (50-100 Hz) increased with the number of stimuli (load) in the contralateral hemifield, whereas lower-frequency power (8-50 Hz) decreased with the total number of stimuli in both hemifields. During the memory delay, lower-frequency power increased with contralateral load. Load effects on higher frequencies during stimulus encoding and lower frequencies during the memory delay were stronger when neural activity also signaled the location of the stimuli. Like power, higher-frequency synchrony increased with load, but beta synchrony (16-30 Hz) showed the opposite effect, increasing when power decreased (stimulus presentation) and decreasing when power increased (memory delay). Our results suggest roles for lower-frequency oscillations in top-down processing and higher-frequency oscillations in bottom-up processing.

Indexed as

AnimalsAttentionBiological ClocksBrain WavesCerebral CortexCognitionHumansMacaca fascicularisMacaca mulattaMaleMemory, Short-TermMental RecallNerve NetPattern Recognition, VisualPhotic StimulationTask Performance and Analysisfrontal eye fieldslateral intraparietal areapowerprefrontal cortexsynchronyworking memory

Identifiers

PMID26286916
PMCPMC5004752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.