Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26286800›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2015

Threats to water resources from hexachlorobenzene waste at Kalush City (Ukraine)--a review of the risks and the remediation options.

Georgii Lysychenko, Roland Weber, Valeria Kovach, Modest Gertsiuk, Alan Watson, Iryna Krasnova

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Assessment and review of organochlorine pesticide pollution in Kyrgyzstan.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2018
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. The need for better management and control of POPs stockpiles.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2015
    Article
  8. The 12th International HCH and Pesticides Forum in Kiev/Ukraine.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Georgii LysychenkoState Institution Institute of Environmental Geochemistry of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv 142, 03680, Ukraine. Lysychenko@ukr.net.
Roland WeberPOPs Environmental Consulting, 73527, Schwäbisch Gmünd, Germany. roland.weber10@web.de.
Valeria KovachState Institution Institute of Environmental Geochemistry of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv 142, 03680, Ukraine.
Modest GertsiukState Institution Institute of Environmental Geochemistry of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv 142, 03680, Ukraine.
Alan WatsonPublic Interest Consultants, Eaton Crescent, Uplands, Swansea, Wales, SA1 4QR, UK.
Iryna KrasnovaState Institution Institute of Environmental Geochemistry of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv 142, 03680, Ukraine.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The production of chlorinated solvents such as tetrachloroethylene and tetrachloromethane has resulted in large stockpiles of unintentionally produced persistent organic pollutants (POPs) including high content of hexachlorobenzene (HCB waste). HCB waste of 15,000 t arising from the production of chlorinated solvents at the Kalush factory in Ukraine was landfilled. In 2008, it was discovered that HCB and other pollutants were escaping from the landfill into local environment including the Sapogi-Limnytsia Rivers, tributaries of the Dniester River. This showed that the HCB waste was not appropriately contained and represented a threat to the Dniester River basin. A Presidential Decree of Ukraine was therefore issued requiring remediation of the site and excavation of the waste. Between 2010 and 2013, approximately 29,445 t of HCB waste and associated contaminated soil was excavated and exported to various EU countries for incineration. This excavation revealed that these wastes can corrode through their drums within a few decades with release of pollutants. Other sites at which chlorinated solvents were produced should therefore be assessed for possible similar pollution. Despite the remediation efforts and the excavation of the landfill, the Kalush area remains a POP-contaminated site requiring further assessment. A part of the waste was exported to Poland and is stored close to the Baltic Sea and is treated in an incinerator with small capacity over a time frame of years. This case and recent similar cases reveal that the control of POP waste for destruction even in EU countries needs to be improved.

Indexed as

Water ResourcesEnvironmental Restoration and RemediationGovernment RegulationHexachlorobenzeneIncinerationIndustrial WasteRisk AssessmentRiversSoil PollutantsUkraineWater Pollutants, ChemicalHexachlorobenzeneIndustrial WasteSoil PollutantsWater Pollutants, ChemicalBasel ConventionChlorinated solventContaminated siteHCBHCBDOrganochlorine productionPOPsPOP waste importStockholm ConventionTetrachloroethylene

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.