Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26286724›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2015

"From me to HIV": a case study of the community experience of donor transition of health programs.

Daniela C Rodríguez, Vandana Tripathi, Meghan Bohren, Amy Paul, Kriti Singh, Vibha Chhabra, Suneeta Singh, Sara Bennett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Political commitment for vulnerable populations during donor transition.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Daniela C RodríguezDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Rm. E-8612, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA. drodri17@jhu.edu.
Vandana TripathiDepartment of Population, Family, and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA.
Meghan BohrenDepartment of Population, Family, and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA.
Amy PaulDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA.
Kriti SinghAmaltas Consulting Pvt Ltd, Delhi, C 20 Hauz Khas, New Delhi, 110 016, India. ksingh@amaltas.asia.
Vibha ChhabraAmaltas Consulting Pvt Ltd, Delhi, C 20 Hauz Khas, New Delhi, 110 016, India.
Suneeta SinghAmaltas Consulting Pvt Ltd, Delhi, C 20 Hauz Khas, New Delhi, 110 016, India.
Sara BennettDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Rm. E-8612, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAvahan, a large-scale HIV prevention program in India, transitioned over 130 intervention sites from donor funding and management to government ownership in three rounds. This paper examines the transition experience from the perspective of the communities targeted by these interventions.

methodsFifteen qualitative longitudinal case studies were conducted across all three rounds of transition, including 83 in-depth interviews and 45 focus group discussions. Data collection took place between 2010 and 2013 in four states: Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu.

resultsWe find that communication about transition was difficult at first but improved over time, while issues related to employment of peer educators were challenging throughout the transition. Clinical services were shifted to government providers resulting in mixed experiences depending on the population being targeted. Lastly, the loss of activities aimed at community ownership and mobilization negatively affected the beneficiaries' view of transition.

conclusionsWhile some programmatic changes resulted in improvements, additional opportunity costs for beneficiaries may pose barriers to accessing HIV prevention services. Communicating and engaging community stakeholders early on in future such transitions may mitigate negative feelings and lead to more constructive relationships and dialogue.

Indexed as

Financing, GovernmentFoundationsHealthcare FinancingDelivery of Health CareFocus GroupsHealth PromotionHIV InfectionsHumansIndiaLongitudinal StudiesQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID26286724
PMCPMC4545328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.