ArticleDrug development research2015
Validated MicroRNA Target Databases: An Evaluation.
Article in Drug development research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed.
- Circulating hsa-miR-29c-3p and VEGF-A levels predict the response to FOLFIRI plus aflibercept in elderly metastatic colorectal cancer patients.European journal of clinical investigation · 2026Trial
- A reliable and verified dataset of functional miRNA-mRNA target interactions for gene regulation studies.Scientific data · 2026Article
- A Narrative Review on Integrative Bioinformatics Approaches for microRNA Research in Familial Mediterranean Fever: Current Insights and Future Directions.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Pivotal Role of miRNA-lncRNA Interactions in Human Diseases.Molecular biotechnology · 2025Review
- Noxa inhibits oncogenesis through ZNF519 in gastric cancer and is suppressed by hsa-miR-200b-3p.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Plasma miR-150-5p in Renal Transplant Recipients with Acute Antibody-Mediated Rejection.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Bioinformatics Prediction for Network-Based Integrative Multi-Omics Expression Data Analysis in Hirschsprung Disease.Biomolecules · 2024Article
- Comparative Analysis of Published Database Predicting MicroRNA Binding in 3'UTR of mRNA in Diverse Species.MicroRNA (Shariqah, United Arab Emirates) · 2024Review
- The landscape of microRNA interaction annotation: analysis of three rare disorders as a case study.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2023Article
- Review of databases for experimentally validated human microRNA-mRNA interactions.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2023Review
- miRNAs in Lymphocytic Leukaemias-The miRror of Drug Resistance.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- miRTarBase update 2022: an informative resource for experimentally validated miRNA-target interactions.Nucleic acids research · 2022Article
- A Complex Heterogeneous Network Model of Disease Regulated by Noncoding RNAs: A Case Study of Unstable Angina Pectoris.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022Article
- Circulating miR-146a as a possible candidate biomarker in the indeterminate phase of Chagas disease.Biological research · 2021Article
- Candidate Alzheimer's Disease Biomarker miR-483-5p Lowers TAU Phosphorylation by Direct ERK1/2 Repression.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- A Genome-Wide Study of Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms in MicroRNAs and Further In Silico Analysis Reveals Their Putative Role in Susceptibility to Late-Onset Alzheimer's Disease.Molecular neurobiology · 2021Article
- miRNA profiling of primate cervicovaginal lavage and extracellular vesicles reveals miR-186-5p as a potential antiretroviral factor in macrophages.FEBS open bio · 2020Article
- Article
- miRTarBase 2020: updates to the experimentally validated microRNA-target interaction database.Nucleic acids research · 2020Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Preclinical Research Positive findings from preclinical and clinical studies involving depletion or supplementation of microRNA (miRNA) engender optimism about miRNA-based therapeutics. However, off-target effects must be considered. Predicting these effects is complicated. Each miRNA may target many gene transcripts, and the rules governing imperfectly complementary miRNA: target interactions are incompletely understood. Several databases provide lists of the relatively small number of experimentally confirmed miRNA: target pairs. Although incomplete, this information might allow assessment of at least some of the off-target effects. We evaluated the performance of four databases of experimentally validated miRNA: target interactions (miRWalk 2.0, miRTarBase, miRecords, and TarBase 7.0) using a list of 50 alphabetically consecutive genes. We examined the provided citations to determine the degree to which each interaction was experimentally supported. To assess stability, we tested at the beginning and end of a five-month period. Results varied widely by database. Two of the databases changed significantly over the course of 5 months. Most reported evidence for miRNA: target interactions were indirect or otherwise weak, and relatively few interactions were supported by more than one publication. Some returned results appear to arise from simplistic text searches that offer no insight into the relationship of the search terms, may not even include the reported gene or miRNA, and may thus, be invalid. We conclude that validation databases provide important information, but not all information in all extant databases is up-to-date or accurate. Nevertheless, the more comprehensive validation databases may provide useful starting points for investigation of off-target effects of proposed small RNA therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.