Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26286669›Full record

ArticleDrug development research2015

Validated MicroRNA Target Databases: An Evaluation.

Yun Ji Diana Lee, Veronica Kim, Dillon C Muth, Kenneth W Witwer

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Drug development research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review of databases for experimentally validated human microRNA-mRNA interactions.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2023
    Review
  11. miRNAs in Lymphocytic Leukaemias-The miRror of Drug Resistance.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yun Ji Diana LeeDepartment of Molecular and Comparative Pathobiology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Veronica KimDepartment of Molecular and Comparative Pathobiology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Dillon C MuthDepartment of Molecular and Comparative Pathobiology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Kenneth W WitwerDepartment of Molecular and Comparative Pathobiology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.

Funding

Vaccine Response and Immunotherapeutics SWGP30AI094189 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Richard E. Chaisson · 2012 to 2026
$67.0M
Training Veterinarians for Careers in Biomedical ResearchT32OD011089 · OD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI JOSEPH L MANKOWSKI · 2012 to 2026
$6.7M
Extracellular Vesicle-Mediated Immunomodulation in HIV Infection and Nicotine AbuseR01DA040385 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WITWER, KENNETH W · 2015 to 2019
$2.3M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI094189NIAID NIH HHS P30AI094189NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA040385NIH HHS T32 OD011089
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preclinical Research Positive findings from preclinical and clinical studies involving depletion or supplementation of microRNA (miRNA) engender optimism about miRNA-based therapeutics. However, off-target effects must be considered. Predicting these effects is complicated. Each miRNA may target many gene transcripts, and the rules governing imperfectly complementary miRNA: target interactions are incompletely understood. Several databases provide lists of the relatively small number of experimentally confirmed miRNA: target pairs. Although incomplete, this information might allow assessment of at least some of the off-target effects. We evaluated the performance of four databases of experimentally validated miRNA: target interactions (miRWalk 2.0, miRTarBase, miRecords, and TarBase 7.0) using a list of 50 alphabetically consecutive genes. We examined the provided citations to determine the degree to which each interaction was experimentally supported. To assess stability, we tested at the beginning and end of a five-month period. Results varied widely by database. Two of the databases changed significantly over the course of 5 months. Most reported evidence for miRNA: target interactions were indirect or otherwise weak, and relatively few interactions were supported by more than one publication. Some returned results appear to arise from simplistic text searches that offer no insight into the relationship of the search terms, may not even include the reported gene or miRNA, and may thus, be invalid. We conclude that validation databases provide important information, but not all information in all extant databases is up-to-date or accurate. Nevertheless, the more comprehensive validation databases may provide useful starting points for investigation of off-target effects of proposed small RNA therapies.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticHumansMicroRNAsMicroRNAsdatabaseinteractionmicroRNAoff-target effectvalidation

Identifiers

PMID26286669
PMCPMC4777876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.