Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26286593›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2015

Effects of sensorimotor training volume on recovery of sensorimotor function in patients following lower limb arthroplasty.

Torsten Pohl, Torsten Brauner, Scott Wearing, Knut Stamer, Thomas Horstmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Torsten PohlConservative and Rehabilitative Orthopedics, Technische Universität München, Faculty for Sport and Health Science, Georg-Brauchle-Ring 60/62, D-80992, Munich, Germany. torsten.pohl@tum.de.
Torsten BraunerConservative and Rehabilitative Orthopedics, Technische Universität München, Faculty for Sport and Health Science, Georg-Brauchle-Ring 60/62, D-80992, Munich, Germany. torsten.brauner@tum.de.
Scott WearingInstitute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia. s.wearing@qut.edu.au.
Knut StamerMedical Park Bad Wiessee St. Hubertus, Bad Wiessee, Germany. K.Stamer@medicalpark.de.
Thomas HorstmannConservative and Rehabilitative Orthopedics, Technische Universität München, Faculty for Sport and Health Science, Georg-Brauchle-Ring 60/62, D-80992, Munich, Germany. t.horstmann@tum.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSensorimotor function is degraded in patients after lower limb arthroplasty. Sensorimotor training is thought to improve sensorimotor skills, however, the optimal training stimulus with regard to volume, frequency, duration, and intensity is still unknown. The aim of this study, therefore, was to firstly quantify the progression of sensorimotor function after total hip (THA) or knee (TKA) arthroplasty and, as second step, to evaluate effects of different sensorimotor training volumes.

methods58 in-patients during their rehabilitation after THA or TKA participated in this prospective cohort study. Sensorimotor function was assessed using a test battery including measures of stabilization capacity, static balance, proprioception, and gait, along with a self-reported pain and function. All participants were randomly assigned to one of three intervention groups performing sensorimotor training two, four, or six times per week. Outcome measures were taken at three instances, at baseline (pre), after 1.5 weeks (mid) and at the conclusion of the 3 week program (post).

resultsAll measurements showed significant improvements over time, with the exception of proprioception and static balance during quiet bipedal stance which showed no significant main effects for time or intervention. There was no significant effect of sensorimotor training volume on any of the outcome measures.

conclusionWe were able to quantify improvements in measures of dynamic, but not static, sensorimotor function during the initial three weeks of rehabilitation following TKA/THA. Although sensorimotor improvements were independent of the training volume applied in the current study, long-term effects of sensorimotor training volume need to be investigated to optimize training stimulus recommendations.

trial registrationClinical trial registration number: DRKS00007894.

Indexed as

AdultAgedArthroplasty, ReplacementCohort StudiesExercise TherapyFemaleHumansLower ExtremityMaleMiddle AgedPostural BalanceProprioceptionProspective StudiesRandom AllocationRecovery of FunctionTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID26286593
PMCPMC4545701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.