Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26286548›Full record

Trial reportBMC neurology2015

The effect of computer-based cognitive flexibility training on recovery of executive function after stroke: rationale, design and methods of the TAPASS study.

Renate M van de Ven, Ben Schmand, Erny Groet, Dick J Veltman, Jaap M J Murre

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC neurology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Occupational therapy for cognitive impairment in stroke patients.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Renate M van de VenDepartment of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Weesperplein 4, 1018, XA, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. r.m.vandeven@uva.nl.
Ben SchmandDepartment of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Weesperplein 4, 1018, XA, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. b.schmand@uva.nl.
Erny GroetHeliomare Research and Development, Relweg 51, 1949, EC, Wijk aan Zee, The Netherlands. e.groet@heliomare.nl.
Dick J VeltmanDepartment of Psychiatry, VU University medical center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081, HZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. dj.veltman@vumc.nl.
Jaap M J MurreDepartment of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Weesperplein 4, 1018, XA, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. jaap@murre.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStroke survivors frequently suffer from executive impairments even in the chronic phase after stroke, and there is a need for improved rehabilitation of these functions. One way of improving current rehabilitation treatment may be by online cognitive training. Based on a review of the effectiveness of computer-based cognitive training in healthy elderly, we concluded that cognitive flexibility may be a key element for an effective training, which results in improvements not merely on trained tasks but also in untrained tasks (i.e., far transfer). The aim of the current study was to track the behavioral and neural effects of computer-based cognitive flexibility training after stroke. We expected that executive functioning would improve after the cognitive flexibility training, and that neural activity and connectivity would normalize towards what is seen in healthy elderly. METHODS/

designThe design was a multicenter, double blind, randomized controlled trial (RCT) with three groups: an experimental intervention group, an active control group who did a mock training, and a waiting list control group. Stroke patients (3 months to 5 years post-stroke) with cognitive complaints were included. Training consisted of 58 half-hour sessions spread over 12 weeks. The primary study outcome was objective executive function. Secondary measures were improvement on training tasks, cognitive flexibility, objective cognitive functioning in other domains than the executive domain, subjective cognitive and everyday life functioning, and neural correlates assessed by both structural and resting-state functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging. The three groups were compared at baseline, after six and twelve weeks of training, and four weeks after the end of the training. Furthermore, they were compared to healthy elderly who received the same training. DISCUSSION: The cognitive flexibility training consisted of several factors deemed important for effects that go beyond improvement on merely the training task themselves. Due to the presence of two control groups, the effects of the training could be compared with spontaneous recovery and with the effects of a mock training. This study provides insight into the potential of online cognitive flexibility training after stroke. We also compared its results with the effectiveness of the same training in healthy elderly.

trial registrationThe Netherlands National Trial Register NTR5174. Registered 22 May 2015.

Indexed as

Executive FunctionStroke RehabilitationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBehaviorCognitionCognition DisordersDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsNeurological Rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID26286548
PMCPMC4545547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.