[Civilian blast injuries: an underestimated problem? : Results of a retrospective analysis of the TraumaRegister DGU®].

backgroundBlast injuries are a rare cause of potentially life-threatening injuries in Germany. During the past 30 years such injuries were seldom the cause of mass casualties, therefore, knowledge and skills in dealing with this type of injury are not very extensive. MATERIAL AND

methodsA retrospective identification of all patients in the TraumaRegister DGU® of the German Trauma Society (TR-DGU) who sustained blast injuries between January 1993 and November 2012 was carried out. The study involved a descriptive characterization of the collective as well as three additional collectives. The arithmetic mean, standard deviation and 95 % confidence interval of the arithmetic mean for different demographic parameters and figures for prehospital and in-hospital settings were calculated. A computation of prognostic scores, such as the Revised Injury Severity Classification (RISC) and the updated version RISC II (TR-DGU-Project-ID 2012-035) was performed.

resultsA total of 137 patients with blast injuries could be identified in the dataset of the TR-DGU. Of the patients 90 % were male and 43 % were transported by the helicopter emergency service (HEMS) to the various trauma centres. The severely injured collective with a mean injury severity scale (ISS) of 18.0 (ISS ≥ 16 = 52 %) had stable vital signs. In none of the cases was it necessary to perform on-site emergency surgery but a very high proportion of patients (59 %) had to be surgically treated before admittance to the intensive care unit (ICU). Of the patients 27 % had severe soft tissue injuries with an Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) ≥ 3 and 90 % of these injuries were burns. The 24 h in-hospital fatality was very low (3 %) but the stay in the ICU tended to be longer than for other types of injury (mean 5.5 ventilation days and 10.7 days in the intensive care unit). Organ failure occurred in 36 % of the cases, multiorgan failure in 29 % and septic events in 14 %. Of the patients 16 % were transferred to another hospital during the first 48 h. The RISC and the updated RISC II tended to underestimate the severity of injuries and mortality (10.2 % vs. 6.8 % and 10.7 % vs. 7.5 %, respectively) and the trauma associated severe hemorrhage (TASH) score underestimated the probability for transfusion of more than 10 units of packed red blood cells (5.0 % vs. 12.5 %).

conclusionThis article generates several hypotheses, which should be confirmed with additional investigations. Until then it has to be concluded that patients who suffer from accidental blast injuries in the civilian setting (excluding military operations and terrorist attacks) show a combination of classical severe trauma with blunt and penetrating injuries and additionally a high proportion of severe burns (combined thermomechanical injury). They stay longer in the ICU than other trauma patients and suffer more complications, such as sepsis and multiorgan failure. Established scores, such as RISC, RISC II and TASH tend to underestimate the severity of the underlying trauma.