Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26286115›Full record

ArticleLeukemia2016

Improved survival in adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the Netherlands: a population-based study on treatment, trial participation and survival.

A G Dinmohamed, A Szabó, M van der Mark, O Visser, P Sonneveld, J J Cornelissen, M Jongen-Lavrencic, A W Rijneveld

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Leukemia, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Routine Practice: A Turkish Multicenter StudyTurkish journal of haematology : official journal of Turkish Society of Haematology · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. The Antioxidant from Ethanolic Extract ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

A G DinmohamedDepartment of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
A SzabóDepartment of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
M van der MarkDepartment of Registration, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
O VisserDepartment of Registration, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
P SonneveldDepartment of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
J J CornelissenDepartment of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
M Jongen-LavrencicDepartment of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
A W RijneveldDepartment of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This nationwide population-based study assessed trends in treatment, trial participation and survival among 1833 adult patients diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in the Netherlands between 1989 and 2012 reported to the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Patients were categorized into four periods and five age groups (18-24, 25-39, 40-59, 60-69 and ⩾70 years). The application of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT), particularly reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) alloSCT, increased over time up to age 70 years. The inclusion rate in the trials was 67, 66, 55, 58 and 0% for the five age groups. Survival improved over time for patients below 70 years. Five-year relative survival in the period 2007-2012 was 75, 57, 37, 22 and 5% for the five age groups. In that same period, 5-year overall survival among patients aged 18-39 years was 68% for the chemotherapy-alone group and 66% for the alloSCT group. For patients aged 40-69 years, the corresponding estimates were 24 and 41%. Pronounced survival improvement observed among patients aged 18-39 years might mainly be explained by implementation of pediatric-based regimens since 2005, whereas among patients aged 40-69 years, increased application of RIC-alloSCT has contributed significantly to the observed improvement. Outcome of patients aged ⩾70 remains unsatisfactory, indicating a need for specific trials for the elderly.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient ParticipationPrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma

Identifiers

PMID26286115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.