Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26286093›Full record

ReviewDrugs & aging2015

Management of Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia in the Elderly: Current Strategies and Developments.

Jeffrey C Bryan, Elias J Jabbour

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs & aging, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. The role of mCell death discovery · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jeffrey C BryanThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Elias J Jabbour

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are refractory to or relapse following frontline treatment constitute a poor-risk group with a poor long-term outcome. Host-related factors and unfavorable disease-related features contribute to early treatment failures following frontline therapy, thus making attainment of remission and long-term survival with salvage therapy particularly challenging for elderly patients. Currently, no optimal salvage strategy exists for responding patients, and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant is the only curative option in this setting; however, the vast majority of elderly patients are not candidates for this procedure due to poor functional status secondary to age and age-related comorbidities. Furthermore, the lack of effective salvage programs available for elderly patients with recurrent AML underscores the need for therapies that consistently yield durable remissions or durable control of their disease. The purpose of this review was to highlight the currently available strategies, as well as future strategies under development, for treating older patients with recurrent AML.

Indexed as

AgedHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteRecurrenceSalvage TherapyTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.