ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2016
A validated, risk assessment tool for predicting readmission after open ventral hernia repair.
Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03424382 (CREATION Health Readmission Risk Assessment Tool), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
CREATION Health Readmission Risk Assessment Tool
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Readmissions and Emergency Room Visits Following Outpatient and Inpatient Herniorrhaphies.Cureus · 2025Article
- Fairness of machine learning readmission predictions following open ventral hernia repair.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Unplanned readmissions after hernia repair.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2023Article
- Early wound morbidity and clinical outcomes associated with P4HB mesh compared to permanent synthetic mesh in umbilical and small to medium, routine ventral hernia repairs.Frontiers in surgery · 2023Article
- Preoperative anemia is a risk factor for poor perioperative outcomes in ventral hernia repair.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2022Article
- Predictors of 30- and 90-Day Readmissions After Complex Abdominal Wall Reconstruction With Biological Mesh: A Longitudinal Study of 232 Patients.World journal of surgery · 2020Article
- Effects of laparoscopic vs open abdominal surgery on costs and hospital readmission rate and its effect modification by surgeons' case volume.Surgical endoscopy · 2020Article
- Predicting the Risk of Readmission From Dehydration After Ileostomy Formation: The Dehydration Readmission After Ileostomy Prediction Score.Diseases of the colon and rectum · 2018Article
- Concomitant open ventral hernia repair: what is the financial impact of performing open ventral hernia with other abdominal procedures concomitantly?Surgical endoscopy · 2018Article
- Ventral hernia repair in patients with abdominal loss of domain: an observational study of one institution's experience.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2017Observational
- Ventral and incisional hernia: the cost of comorbidities and complications.Surgical endoscopy · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background/purposeTo present a validated model that reliably predicts unplanned readmission after open ventral hernia repair (open-VHR). STUDY
designA total of 17,789 open-VHR patients were identified using the 2011-2012 ACS-NSQIP databases. This cohort was subdivided into 70 and 30% random testing and validation samples, respectively. Thirty-day unplanned readmission was defined as unexpected readmission for a postoperative occurrence related to the open-VHR procedure. Independent predictors of 30-day unplanned readmission were identified using multivariable logistic regression on the testing sample (n = 12,452 patients). Subsequently, the predictors were weighted according to β-coefficients to generate an integer-based Clinical Risk Score (CRS) predictive of readmission, which was validated using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis of the validation sample (n = 5337 patients).
resultsThe rate of 30-day unplanned readmission was 4.7%. Independent risk factors included inpatient status at time of open-VHR, operation time, enterolysis, underweight, diabetes, preoperative anemia, length of stay, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, history of bleeding disorders, hernia with gangrene, and panniculectomy (all P < 0.05). ROC analysis of the validation cohort rendered an area under the curve of 0.71, which demonstrates the accuracy of this prediction model. Predicted incidence within each 5 risk strata was statistically similar to the observed incidence in the validation sample (P = 0.18), further highlighting the accuracy of this model.
conclusionWe present a validated risk stratification tool for unplanned readmissions following open-VHR. Future studies should determine if implementation of our CRS optimizes safety and reduces readmission rates in open-VHR patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26286089What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.