Trial reportJournal of diabetes science and technology2015
Glycemic Variability and Its Impact on Quality of Life in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes.
Trial report in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The relationship between well-being and HbA1c in adults with type 1 diabetes: A systematic review.Journal of diabetes · 2023Pooled it
- The Evolving Landscape of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Metrics in Type 1 Diabetes: Narrative Literature Review.JMIR diabetes · 2026Review
- Continuous glucose monitoring-based evaluation of percentage coefficient of variation (%CV) as a metric of intraday glycemic variability in South India.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Ketogenic diet, adenosine, and dopamine in addiction and psychiatry.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Review
- The clinical importance of measuring glycaemic variability: Utilising new metrics to optimise glycaemic control.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2024Review
- Association between glycemic control and patient-reported outcomes in adults with type 1 diabetes in Japan: the SAGE study subanalysis.Diabetology international · 2024Article
- Glycemic Variability Assessment with a 14-Day Continuous Glucose Monitoring System: When and How Long to Measure MAGE (Mean Amplitude of Glucose Excursion) for Optimal Reliability?Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2022Article
- The Role of Glucagon in Glycemic Variability in Type 1 Diabetes: A Narrative Review.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2021Review
- Association between type 1 diabetes and female sexual dysfunction.BMC women's health · 2020Article
- Effects of Flash Glucose Monitoring on Dietary Variety, Physical Activity, and Self-Care Behaviors in Patients with Diabetes.Journal of diabetes research · 2020Article
- Glycaemic variability: The under-recognized therapeutic target in type 1 diabetes care.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2019Review
- Impact of the Type of Continuous Insulin Administration on Metabolism in a Diabetic Rat Model.Journal of diabetes research · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere is evidence suggesting that glycemic variability reduces quality of life (QoL) in people with type 2 diabetes, but this association has not been explored in type 1 diabetes. We aimed to assess whether glycemic variability has an impact on QoL in adults with established type 1 diabetes using multiple daily injections (MDI) of insulin or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII).
methodsParticipants wore a blinded continuous glucose monitor for up to 5 days and completed the diabetes quality of life (DQOL) questionnaire. Glycemic variability measures were calculated using the EasyGV version 9.0 software. A correlation analysis was performed to assess whether there was a relationship between glycemic variability and measures of QoL.
resultsIn all, 57 participants with type 1 diabetes (51% male, 65% on CSII, 35% on MDI, mean [SD] age 41 [13] years, duration of diabetes 21 [12] years, HbA1c 63 [12] mmol/mol [7.9% (1.1)], body mass index 25.2 [4.0] kg/m(2)) were included in the analysis. No significant associations between glycemic variability and DQOL total or subscale scores were demonstrated. The glycemic variability was significantly higher for MDI participants compared to CSII participants (P < .05 for all glycemic variability measures), but no significant difference in QoL between the 2 treatment modality groups was observed.
conclusionsTreatment with CSII is associated with lower glycemic variability compared to MDI. Despite this, and contrary to findings in type 2 diabetes, this study did not find an association between glycemic variability and QoL in adults with relatively well-controlled type 1 diabetes, irrespective of whether they are on MDI or CSII.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.