Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26285812›Full record

ReviewJournal of dental research2015

Salivary Glands: Stem Cells, Self-duplication, or Both?

M H Aure, S Arany, C E Ovitt

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of dental research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Hydrogels for Salivary Gland Tissue Engineering.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Dynamics of Salivary Gland AQP5 under Normal and Pathologic Conditions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

M H AureCenter for Oral Biology, Department of Biomedical Genetics, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.
S AranyCenter for Oral Biology, Department of Biomedical Genetics, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.
C E OvittCenter for Oral Biology, Department of Biomedical Genetics, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA Catherine_Ovitt@urmc.rochester.edu.

Funding

Salivary gland precursor cellsR01DE018896 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI OVITT, CATHERINE · 2009 to 2013
$2.1M
Cell Based Regeneration of Salivary GlandsR01DE022949 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI OVITT, CATHERINE · 2012 to 2015
$1.5M
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE018896NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE022949
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the intrinsic potential for renewal and regeneration within a tissue is critical for the rational design of reparative strategies. Maintenance of the salivary glands is widely thought to depend on the differentiation of stem cells. However, there is also new evidence that homeostasis of the salivary glands, like that of the liver and pancreas, relies on self-renewal of differentiated cells rather than a stem cell pool. Here, we review the evidence for both modes of turnover and consider the implications for the process of regeneration. We propose that the view of salivary glands as postmitotic and dependent on stem cells for renewal be revised to reflect the proliferative activity of acinar cells and their role in salivary gland homeostasis.

Indexed as

Acinar CellsAnimalsCell ProliferationHomeostasisHumansRegenerationSalivary GlandsStem Cellsacinar cellsproliferationregenerationstem/progenitor cellsthymidine labelingtissue homeostasis

Identifiers

PMID26285812
PMCPMC4622322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.