Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26285773›Full record

ArticleSexually transmitted infections2016

Use of a risk quiz to predict infection for sexually transmitted infections: a retrospective analysis of acceptability and positivity.

Charlotte A Gaydos, Mary Jett-Goheen, Mathilda Barnes, Laura Dize, Perry Barnes, Yu-Hsiang Hsieh

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexually transmitted infections, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Clinical and sexual risk correlates ofSexually transmitted infections · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Charlotte A GaydosDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA Department of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Mary Jett-GoheenDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Mathilda BarnesDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Laura DizeDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Perry BarnesDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Yu-Hsiang HsiehDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · US

Funding

LC: HIV Prevention Trials Network - Laboratory Support for the SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence Study (CoVPN 5002)UM1AI068613 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SUSAN H ESHLEMAN, Mark A Marzinke · 2011 to 2026
$100.2M
TrainingU54EB007958 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Yukari C Manabe · 2007 to 2026
$34.6M
HIV Prevention Trials Network: Network LaboratoryU01AI068613 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ESHLEMAN, SUSAN H · 2006 to 2010
$16.5M
NIAID NIH HHS AI068613-01NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI068613NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068613NIBIB NIH HHS U54 EB007958NIBIB NIH HHS U54EB007958
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndividuals who are sexually active may want to make a decision as to whether they are at risk for having a sexually transmitted infection (STI) such as Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Trichomonas vaginalis. Our goal was to develop and evaluate a simple self-taken sexual risk quiz for participants, ordering an online STI self-collection test kit to determine whether the score predicted infection status.

methodsAs part of the IWantTheKit programme for home sample self-collection for STIs, 2010-2013, the programme asked male and female users to voluntarily take a risk quiz. The six-question quiz was about risk behaviour and included an age question. Data analyses were stratified by gender as determined a priori. Scores 0-10 were stratified into risk groups for each gender based on similar risk score-specific STI prevalence. Retrospective analyses were performed to assess whether risk group predicted aggregate STI positivity. Urogenital/rectal mailed samples were tested by nucleic acid amplification tests.

resultsMore females (N=836) than males (N=558) provided voluntary risk scores. The percentage of eligible participants who submitted scores was 43.9% for both females and males. There was a higher STI infection rate in females (14.0%) than in males (7.0%) for having any STI (p<0.001). Multivariate logistic analysis for females, which controlled for age and race, demonstrated that a higher risk score group independently predicted risk for having an STI (OR of 2.2 for risk scores 5-7 and 4.2 OR for scores of 8-10). For males, the multivariate model, which controlled for race, indicated that no risk score group was associated having an STI.

conclusionsResults of a participant's own sexual risk quiz score independently predicted STI positivity for women, but not for men. Further study of this simple risk quiz is required.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCondomsDiagnostic Self EvaluationFemaleHealth EducationHumansMaleMass ScreeningNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesProgram EvaluationRetrospective StudiesSelf CareSexual BehaviorSexually Transmitted DiseasesSurveys and QuestionnairesCHLAMYDIA INFECTIONCHLAMYDIA TRACHOMATISGONORRHOEANEISSERIA GONORRHOEATRICHOMONAS

Identifiers

PMID26285773
PMCPMC4724223
OpenAlexW2283465469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.