Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26285593›Full record

ArticleBMC gastroenterology2015

Outcomes of endoscopic management of primary and refractory postcholecystectomy biliary leaks in a multicentre review of 178 patients.

Jorge Canena, David Horta, João Coimbra, Liliane Meireles, Pedro Russo, Inês Marques, Leonel Ricardo, Catarina Rodrigues, Tiago Capela, Diana Carvalho and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Bile Leak: Is There Optimal Timing for Endoscopy?Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Endoscopic management of biliary leaks: Where are we now?World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Hepaticojejunostomy for bile duct injury: state of the art.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Trans-papillary bilio-pancreatic stenting: When how and which stent.Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jorge CanenaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Doutor Fernando Fonseca Hospital, IC 19, 2720-276, Amadora, Portugal. jmtcanena@live.com.pt.
David HortaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Doutor Fernando Fonseca Hospital, IC 19, 2720-276, Amadora, Portugal. david0rta@hotmail.com.
João CoimbraDepartment of Gastroenterology, Santo António dos Capuchos Hospital at Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Central, Nova Medical School-Faculty of Medical Sciences, Alameda Santo António dos Capuchos, 1169-050, Lisbon, Portugal. jmgcoimbra@sapo.pt.
Liliane MeirelesDepartment of Gastroenterology, Pulido Valente Hospital at Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte, Alameda das Linhas de Torres n° 117, 1769-001, Lisbon, Portugal. lilianeenailil@gmail.com.
Pedro RussoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Santo António dos Capuchos Hospital at Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Central, Nova Medical School-Faculty of Medical Sciences, Alameda Santo António dos Capuchos, 1169-050, Lisbon, Portugal. pedro.me.russo@gmail.com.
Inês MarquesDepartment of Gastroenterology, Pulido Valente Hospital at Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte, Alameda das Linhas de Torres n° 117, 1769-001, Lisbon, Portugal. inesnmarques@zonmail.pt.
Leonel RicardoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Doutor Fernando Fonseca Hospital, IC 19, 2720-276, Amadora, Portugal. 14ricardo@gmail.com.
Catarina RodriguesDepartment of Gastroenterology, Doutor Fernando Fonseca Hospital, IC 19, 2720-276, Amadora, Portugal. catarinagr@hotmail.com.
Tiago CapelaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Santo António dos Capuchos Hospital at Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Central, Nova Medical School-Faculty of Medical Sciences, Alameda Santo António dos Capuchos, 1169-050, Lisbon, Portugal. teixeira.capela@gmail.com.
Diana CarvalhoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Santo António dos Capuchos Hospital at Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Central, Nova Medical School-Faculty of Medical Sciences, Alameda Santo António dos Capuchos, 1169-050, Lisbon, Portugal. dianafbcarvalho@gmail.com.
Rafaela LoureiroDepartment of Gastroenterology, Santo António dos Capuchos Hospital at Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Central, Nova Medical School-Faculty of Medical Sciences, Alameda Santo António dos Capuchos, 1169-050, Lisbon, Portugal. loureiro.rafaela@gmail.com.
António Mateus DiasDepartment of Gastroenterology, Santo António dos Capuchos Hospital at Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Central, Nova Medical School-Faculty of Medical Sciences, Alameda Santo António dos Capuchos, 1169-050, Lisbon, Portugal. amateusdias@netcabo.pt.
Gonçalo RamosDepartment of Gastroenterology, Santo António dos Capuchos Hospital at Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Central, Nova Medical School-Faculty of Medical Sciences, Alameda Santo António dos Capuchos, 1169-050, Lisbon, Portugal. goncalo.o.ramos@gmail.com.
António Pereira CoutinhoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Pulido Valente Hospital at Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte, Alameda das Linhas de Torres n° 117, 1769-001, Lisbon, Portugal. avpc@ip.pt.
Carlos RomãoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Pulido Valente Hospital at Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte, Alameda das Linhas de Torres n° 117, 1769-001, Lisbon, Portugal. menezes_romao@yahoo.com.
Pedro Mota VeigaCurva de Gauss - Research, Training and Consulting, Rua Doutor Eduardo Maria dos Santos, Lote 1, Loja 3, 3525-000, Canas de Senhorim, Portugal. geral@curva-de-gauss.pt.
Hospital Santo António dos Capuchos · PTHospital Prof. Dr. Fernando Fonseca · PTCentro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte · PTHospital Pulido Valente · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBiliary leaks have been treated with endoscopic management using different techniques with conflicting results. Furthermore the appropriate rescue therapy for refractory leaks has not been established. We evaluated the clinical effectiveness of initial endotherapy for postcholecystectomy biliary leaks using an homogenous approach (sphincterotomy + placement of a 10-French plastic stent) in a large series of patients as well as the optimal and efficacy of rescue endotherapy for refractory biliary leaks.

methodsThis was a multicenter, retrospective study of 178 patients who underwent endoscopic management of postcholecystectomy biliary leaks with a combination of biliary sphincterotomy and the placement of a large-bore (10-French) plastic stent. Data were collected to analyze the clinical outcomes and technical success, efficacy of the rescue endotherapy and the need for surgery, adverse events and prognostic factors for clinical success of endotherapy.

resultsFollowing endotherapy, closure of the leak was accomplished in 162/178 patients (91.0%). The multivariate logistic model showed that the type of leak, namely a high-grade biliary leak, was the only independent prognostic factor associated with treatment failure (OR = 26.78; 95% CI = 6.59-108.83; P < 0.01). The remaining 16 patients were treated with multiple plastic stents (MPSs) with a success rate of 62.5% (10 patients). The use of fewer than 3 plastic stents (P = 0.023) and a high-grade biliary leak (P = 0.034) were shown to be significant predictors of treatment failure with MPSs in refractory bile leaks. The 6 patients in whom the placement of MPSs failed were retreated with a fully cover self-expandable metallic stent (FCSEMS), resulting in closure of the leak in all cases.

conclusionsEndotherapy of biliary leaks with a combination of biliary sphincterotomy and the placement of a large-bore plastic stent is associated with a high rate of success (90%). However in our series there were several failures using MPSs as a strategy for rescue endotherapy suggesting that refractory biliary leaks should be treated with FCSEMS especially in patients with high-grade leaks.

Indexed as

Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeSphincterotomy, EndoscopicStentsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBile DuctsCholecystectomy, LaparoscopicFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedReoperationRetrospective StudiesSelf Expandable Metallic Stents

Identifiers

PMID26285593
PMCPMC4545536
OpenAlexW2137357393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.