ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2015
Advances in axial imaging of peripheral vascular disease.
Review in Current cardiology reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Infrared thermography and dual-layer spectral CT for the detection of femoral vascular compromise: an experimental large animal study.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026Article
- tMIP-CTA Application in Infra-knee Artery Angiography for Diabetic Lower Extremity Disease.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Radiomics features and clinical factors for predicting restenosis following endovascular therapy in patients with peripheral artery disease.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Virtual Non-Contrast Reconstructions Derived from Dual-Energy CTA Scans in Peripheral Arterial Disease: Comparison with True Non-Contrast Images and Impact on Radiation Dose.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Multi-modality imaging for assessment of the microcirculation in peripheral artery disease: Bench to clinical practice.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2024Article
- The Clinical Utility of Lower Extremity Dual-Energy CT Angiography in the Detection of Bone Marrow Edema in Diabetic Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Multi-Modality Imaging of Atheromatous Plaques in Peripheral Arterial Disease: Integrating Molecular and Imaging Markers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- CT-Angiography-Based Outcome Prediction on Diabetic Foot Ulcer Patients: A Statistical Learning Approach.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Quiescent-Interval Single-Shot Magnetic Resonance Angiography.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Review
- Noninvasive Arterial Testing: What and When to Use.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2018Review
- Full realization of internal mammary artery injury after blunt chest trauma.Turk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Peripheral artery disease (PAD) has become increasingly common in the US patient population and can be a highly symptomatic and significant source of morbidity. When PAD is suspected, the first-line screening study that is obtained is typically a noninvasive evaluation that includes the ankle brachial index (ABI). Following a positive screening study, invasive catheter digital subtraction angiography (DSA) has been historically used to image the peripheral artery system and still remains the gold standard. However, newer developments in axial imaging including computed tomography angiography (CTA) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) have in large part supplanted DSA for imaging the peripheral artery system in clinical practice. Benefits of CTA include rapid noninvasive acquisition, wide availability, high spatial resolution, and the ability to generate isotropic datasets on 64-detector row and higher CT scanners, thereby allowing for multiplanar 3D reformatting. Drawbacks of CTA include the exposure to both iodinated contrast and ionizing radiation, although the radiation dose exposure is lower than for DSA, and newer techniques such as using low tube voltage and rapid acquisition times allow for lower contrast doses. The presence of vascular calcification also limits the evaluation of small distal arteries using CTA, although the development of dual-energy CT techniques has significantly addressed this issue. Benefits of MRA include the avoidance of exposure to ionizing radiation and high diagnostic accuracy, while drawbacks include limited availability and increased cost along with the risk of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis that is associated with gadolinium-based contrast agents, although the latter can be mitigated by using newer non-contrast MR angiography techniques. Future technical advances in CT and MR hardware and software and MR pulse sequences will likely lead to the broader applicability and increased accuracy of noninvasive axial imaging in the evaluation of patients with peripheral artery disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.