ArticlePLoS computational biology2015
Nonconsensus Protein Binding to Repetitive DNA Sequence Elements Significantly Affects Eukaryotic Genomes.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- How to scan naked DNA using promiscuous recognition and no clamping: a model for pioneer transcription factors.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- TFscope: systematic analysis of the sequence features involved in the binding preferences of transcription factors.Genome biology · 2024Article
- Noncanonical binding of transcription factors: time to revisitMolecular biology of the cell · 2023Review
- Repetitive DNA symmetry elements negatively regulate gene expression in embryonic stem cells.Biophysical journal · 2022Article
- Regulatory SNPs: Altered Transcription Factor Binding Sites Implicated in Complex Traits and Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Pou5f3, SoxB1, and Nanog remodel chromatin on high nucleosome affinity regions at zygotic genome activation.Genome research · 2019Article
- A distinct class of antioxidant response elements is consistently activated in tumors with NRF2 mutations.Redox biology · 2018Article
- Toward deciphering the mechanistic role of variations in the Rep1 repeat site in the transcription regulation of SNCA gene.Neurogenetics · 2018Article
- Comprehensive, high-resolution binding energy landscapes reveal context dependencies of transcription factor binding.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018Article
- Energetic funnel facilitates facilitated diffusion.Nucleic acids research · 2018Article
- Transcription pausing: biological significance of thermal fluctuations biased by repetitive genomic sequences.Transcription · 2018Article
- Structural variants in SNCA gene and the implication to synucleinopathies.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2017Review
- Control of transcriptional pausing by biased thermal fluctuations on repetitive genomic sequences.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016Article
- The SSV Evaluation System: A Tool to Prioritize Short Structural Variants for Studies of Possible Regulatory and Causal Variants.Human mutation · 2016Article
- How motif environment influences transcription factor search dynamics: Finding a needle in a haystack.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent genome-wide experiments in different eukaryotic genomes provide an unprecedented view of transcription factor (TF) binding locations and of nucleosome occupancy. These experiments revealed that a large fraction of TF binding events occur in regions where only a small number of specific TF binding sites (TFBSs) have been detected. Furthermore, in vitro protein-DNA binding measurements performed for hundreds of TFs indicate that TFs are bound with wide range of affinities to different DNA sequences that lack known consensus motifs. These observations have thus challenged the classical picture of specific protein-DNA binding and strongly suggest the existence of additional recognition mechanisms that affect protein-DNA binding preferences. We have previously demonstrated that repetitive DNA sequence elements characterized by certain symmetries statistically affect protein-DNA binding preferences. We call this binding mechanism nonconsensus protein-DNA binding in order to emphasize the point that specific consensus TFBSs do not contribute to this effect. In this paper, using the simple statistical mechanics model developed previously, we calculate the nonconsensus protein-DNA binding free energy for the entire C. elegans and D. melanogaster genomes. Using the available chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (ChIP-seq) results on TF-DNA binding preferences for ~100 TFs, we show that DNA sequences characterized by low predicted free energy of nonconsensus binding have statistically higher experimental TF occupancy and lower nucleosome occupancy than sequences characterized by high free energy of nonconsensus binding. This is in agreement with our previous analysis performed for the yeast genome. We suggest therefore that nonconsensus protein-DNA binding assists the formation of nucleosome-free regions, as TFs outcompete nucleosomes at genomic locations with enhanced nonconsensus binding. In addition, here we perform a new, large-scale analysis using in vitro TF-DNA preferences obtained from the universal protein binding microarrays (PBM) for ~90 eukaryotic TFs belonging to 22 different DNA-binding domain types. As a result of this new analysis, we conclude that nonconsensus protein-DNA binding is a widespread phenomenon that significantly affects protein-DNA binding preferences and need not require the presence of consensus (specific) TFBSs in order to achieve genome-wide TF-DNA binding specificity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.