Trial reportSleep2016
A Collaborative Paradigm for Improving Management of Sleep Disorders in Primary Care: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in Sleep, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00390572 (Sleep Specialty Consultation), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Sleep Specialty Consultation: Improving Management of Sleep Disorders
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Physicians' awareness of non-pharmacological therapies for insomnia in the Czech Republic.Croatian medical journal · 2026Article
- Sleep disturbances and heart failure: observational study and Mendelian randomization study.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2025Article
- Benzodiazepine use in Spain: risks and perspectives on the current situation and proposals for their rational use.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- 'Let's talk about sleep health' within primary care: a qualitative study of patients' willingness to engage in psychological interventions for insomnia.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024Article
- Wake Up America: National Survey of Patients' and Physicians' Views and Attitudes on Insomnia Care.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Health Inequities and Racial Disparity in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Diagnosis: A Call for Action.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2022Article
- Comparison of actigraphy indices among patients with depression and schizophrenia: A preliminary study.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2021Article
- Measures of Sleep in Rheumatologic Diseases: Sleep Quality Patient-Reported Outcomes in Rheumatologic Diseases.Arthritis care & research · 2020Review
- Rationale and design of technology assisted stepped collaborative care intervention to improve patient-centered outcomes in hemodialysis patients (TĀCcare trial).Contemporary clinical trials · 2018Article
- Patient-centered care in obstructive sleep apnea: A vision for the future.Sleep medicine reviews · 2018Review
- Impact of Portable Sleep Testing.Sleep medicine clinics · 2017Review
- Sleep Disturbances in OEF/OIF/OND Veterans: Associations with PTSD, Personality, and Coping.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2017Article
- Sleep and Weight among Our Veterans.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo test a collaborative care model for interfacing sleep specialists with primary care providers to enhance patients' sleep disorders management.
methodsThis study used a randomized, parallel group, clinical intervention trial design. A total of 137 adult (29 women) VA outpatients with sleep complaints were enrolled and randomly assigned to (1) an intervention (INT) consisting of a one-time consultation with a sleep specialist who provided diagnostic feedback and treatment recommendations to the patient and the patient's primary care provider; or (2) a control condition consisting of their usual primary care (UPC). Provider-focused outcomes included rates of adherence to recommended diagnostic procedures and sleep-focused interventions. Patient-focused outcomes included measures taken from sleep diaries and actigraphy; Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) scores; and self-report measures of sleepiness, fatigue, mood, quality of life, and satisfaction with health care.
resultsThe proportions of provider-initiated sleep-focused interventions were significantly higher in the INT group than in the UPC group for polysomnography referrals (49% versus 6%; P < 0.001) and mental health clinic referrals (19% versus 6%; P = 0.02). At the 10-mo follow up, INT recipients showed greater estimated mean reductions in diary total wake time (-17.0 min; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -30.9, -3.1; P = 0.02) and greater increases in sleep efficiency (+3.7%; 95% CI: 0.8, 6.5; P = 0.01) than did UPC participants. A greater proportion of the INT group showed ≥ 1 standard deviation decline on the PSQI from baseline to the 10-mo follow-up (41% versus 21%; P = 0.02). Moreover, 69% of the INT group had normal (≤ 10) Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores at the 10-mo follow-up, whereas only 50% of the UPC group fell below this clinical cutoff (P = 0.03).
conclusionsA one-time sleep consultation significantly increased healthcare providers' attention to sleep problems and resulted in benefits to patients' sleep/wake symptoms. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: This study is registered with clinicaltrials.gov with identifier # NCT00390572.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.