Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26284357›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

An Economic Assessment Model of Rural and Remote Satellite Hemodialysis Units.

Thomas W Ferguson, James Zacharias, Simon R Walker, David Collister, Claudio Rigatto, Navdeep Tangri, Paul Komenda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Is Assisted Peritoneal Dialysis a Solution for Northern Manitoba?Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Thomas W FergusonDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba; Winnipeg, Canada.
James ZachariasDepartment of Medicine, Section of Nephrology, University of Manitoba; Winnipeg, Canada; Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba; Winnipeg, Canada.
Simon R WalkerDepartment of Medicine, Section of Nephrology, University of Manitoba; Winnipeg, Canada.
David CollisterDepartment of Medicine, Section of Nephrology, University of Manitoba; Winnipeg, Canada.
Claudio RigattoDepartment of Medicine, Section of Nephrology, University of Manitoba; Winnipeg, Canada.
Navdeep TangriDepartment of Medicine, Section of Nephrology, University of Manitoba; Winnipeg, Canada; Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba; Winnipeg, Canada.
Paul KomendaDepartment of Medicine, Section of Nephrology, University of Manitoba; Winnipeg, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKidney Failure is epidemic in many remote communities in Canada. In-centre hemodialysis is provided within these settings in satellite hemodialysis units. The key cost drivers of this program have not been fully described. Such information is important in informing the design of programs aimed at optimizing efficiency in providing dialysis and preventative chronic kidney disease care in remote communities. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, AND MEASUREMENTS: We constructed a cost model based on data derived from 16 of Manitoba, Canada's remote satellite units. We included all costs for operation of the unit, transportation, treatment, and capital costs. All costs were presented in 2013 Canadian dollars.

resultsThe annual per-patient cost of providing hemodialysis in the satellite units ranged from $80,372 to $215,918 per patient, per year. The median per patient, per year cost was $99,888 (IQR $89,057-$122,640). Primary cost drivers were capital costs related to construction, human resource expenses, and expenses for return to tertiary care centres for health care. Costs related to transport considerably increased estimates in units that required plane or helicopter transfers.

conclusionsSatellite hemodialysis units in remote areas are more expensive on a per-patient basis than hospital hemodialysis and satellite hemodialysis available in urban areas. In some rural, remote locations, better value for money may reside in local surveillance and prevention programs in addition support for home dialysis therapies over construction of new satellite hemodialysis units.

Indexed as

Models, EconomicRemote ConsultationRural Health ServicesHemodialysis Units, HospitalHumansKidney Failure, ChronicManitobaRenal DialysisResource Allocation

Identifiers

PMID26284357
PMCPMC4540589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.