Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26284340›Full record

ReviewStem cells (Dayton, Ohio)2015

Theory and Practice of Lineage Tracing.

Ya-Chieh Hsu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Cell lineage tracing: Methods, applications, and challenges.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Tracking of lineage massLab on a chip · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Mechanisms of Regeneration and Fibrosis in the Endometrium.Annual review of cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ya-Chieh HsuDepartment of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

Regulation of Quiescence and Activation in Skin Stem CellsR00AR063127 · NIAMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI HSU, YA-CHIEH · 2014 to 2016
$747k
NIAMS NIH HHS R00 AR063127NIAMS NIH HHS R00-AR063127
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lineage tracing is a method that delineates all progeny produced by a single cell or a group of cells. The possibility of performing lineage tracing initiated the field of Developmental Biology and continues to revolutionize Stem Cell Biology. Here, I introduce the principles behind a successful lineage-tracing experiment. In addition, I summarize and compare different methods for conducting lineage tracing and provide examples of how these strategies can be implemented to answer fundamental questions in development and regeneration. The advantages and limitations of each method are also discussed.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell LineageEmbryonic Stem CellsFluorescent DyesHumansRadiometric DatingStaining and LabelingStem CellsFluorescent DyesAdult stem cellsCell biologyCell cycleCell surface markersStem cell-microenvironment interactions

Identifiers

PMID26284340
PMCPMC4618107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.