Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26284338›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2015

TLE3 is not a predictive biomarker for taxane sensitivity in the NCIC CTG MA.21 clinical trial.

J M S Bartlett, T O Nielsen, D Gao, K A Gelmon, M A Quintayo, J Starczynski, L Han, M J Burnell, M N Levine, B E Chen and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Transducin-Like Enhancer of Split 3 (TLE3) Expression Is Associated with Taxane Sensitivity in Nonserous Ovarian Carcinoma in a Three-Cohort Study.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2018
    Article
  6. TLE3 represses colorectal cancer proliferation by inhibiting MAPK and AKT signaling pathways.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

J M S BartlettOntario Institute for Cancer Research, 661 University Avenue, Suite 510, Toronto, Ontario M5G 0A3, Canada.
T O NielsenGenetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, British Columbia (BC) Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 1M9, Canada.
D GaoGenetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, British Columbia (BC) Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 1M9, Canada.
K A GelmonBC Cancer Agency, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 4E6, Canada.
M A QuintayoOntario Institute for Cancer Research, 661 University Avenue, Suite 510, Toronto, Ontario M5G 0A3, Canada.
J StarczynskiOntario Institute for Cancer Research, 661 University Avenue, Suite 510, Toronto, Ontario M5G 0A3, Canada.
L HanNCIC Clinical Trials Group, Queen's University, 10 Stuart Street, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada.
M J BurnellSaint John Regional Hospital, Saint John, New Brunswick E2L 4L4, Canada.
M N LevineJuravinski Cancer Clinic, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario L8V 5C2, Canada.
B E ChenNCIC Clinical Trials Group, Queen's University, 10 Stuart Street, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada.
L E ShepherdNCIC Clinical Trials Group, Queen's University, 10 Stuart Street, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada.
J W ChapmanNCIC Clinical Trials Group, Queen's University, 10 Stuart Street, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada.
NCIC CTG
Ontario Institute for Cancer Research · CAQueen's University · CABC Cancer Agency · CAJuravinski Cancer Centre · CA

Funding

NCIC Foreign AccrualsU10CA077202 · NCI · QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY AT KINGSTON · PI EISENHAUER, ELIZABETH · 1998 to 2013
$14.6M
NCI NIH HHS #2U10CA077202
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTLE3, a nuclear transcriptional repressor downstream of WNT signalling pathways, has been hypothesised as predictive of benefit from adjuvant taxane.

methodsMA.21 tissue microarrays were constructed from 1097 out of 2104 (52%) patients. TLE3 staining by immunohistochemistry used validated methodology. Continuous TLE3+ (percentage of cells staining positive) was assessed with both visual and automated scoring. The primary objective was to test the predictive effect of TLE3 on relapse-free survival using the MA.21 EC/T and CEF arms and the previously defined cut-point of 30% of cells staining positive in ⩾1 core/tumour.

resultsMA.21 patients had 83.2% TLE3 positive (TLE3+) tumours by visual score and 80.6% TLE3+ by automated image analysis while the previously observed rate of TLE3+ cases was 58.6%. TLE3 expression was significantly associated with ER expression (91.2% of ER-positive tumours were TLE3+; P<0.0001). At median 8-year follow-up, there was no evidence of a predictive effect of TLE3 expression with respect to taxane benefit using the established 30% or exploratory quartile cut-points.

conclusionsProportionately more MA.21 patient tumours than expected were TLE3+. The pre-specified TLE3+ cut-point of 30% was not predictive of taxane benefit. TLE3 expression does not represent a viable biomarker for taxane benefit in breast cancer.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsBridged-Ring CompoundsClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicCo-Repressor ProteinsDisease-Free SurvivalDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalTaxoidsAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorBridged-Ring CompoundsCo-Repressor ProteinstaxaneTaxoidsTLE3 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID26284338
PMCPMC4559832
OpenAlexW1195715571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.