Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26284100›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2015

The battle in the apoplast: further insights into the roles of proteases and their inhibitors in plant-pathogen interactions.

Mansoor Karimi Jashni, Rahim Mehrabi, Jérôme Collemare, Carl H Mesarich, Pierre J G M de Wit

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 105 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
105citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
32.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

105 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 239 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Complex of Defense Polypeptides of Wheatgrass (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Transcriptome analysis ofFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

45 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 4 countries.

Mansoor Karimi JashniLaboratory of Phytopathology, Wageningen University and Research Centre , Wageningen, Netherlands ; Department of Plant Pathology, Tarbiat Modares University , Tehran, Iran.
Rahim MehrabiLaboratory of Phytopathology, Wageningen University and Research Centre , Wageningen, Netherlands ; Cereal Research Department, Seed and Plant Improvement Institute , Karaj, Iran.
Jérôme CollemareLaboratory of Phytopathology, Wageningen University and Research Centre , Wageningen, Netherlands ; UMR1345, IRHS-INRA, Beaucouzé , France.
Carl H MesarichLaboratory of Phytopathology, Wageningen University and Research Centre , Wageningen, Netherlands ; Bioprotection Technologies, The New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research Limited, Mount Albert Research Centre , Auckland, New Zealand.
Pierre J G M de WitLaboratory of Phytopathology, Wageningen University and Research Centre , Wageningen, Netherlands.
Wageningen University & Research · NLPlant & Food Research · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Upon host penetration, fungal pathogens secrete a plethora of effectors to promote disease, including proteases that degrade plant antimicrobial proteins, and protease inhibitors (PIs) that inhibit plant proteases with antimicrobial activity. Conversely, plants secrete proteases and PIs to protect themselves against pathogens or to mediate recognition of pathogen proteases and PIs, which leads to induction of defense responses. Many examples of proteases and PIs mediating effector-triggered immunity in host plants have been reported in the literature, but little is known about their role in compromising basal defense responses induced by microbe-associated molecular patterns. Recently, several reports appeared in literature on secreted fungal proteases that modify or degrade pathogenesis-related proteins, including plant chitinases or PIs that compromise their activities. This prompted us to review the recent advances on proteases and PIs involved in fungal virulence and plant defense. Proteases and PIs from plants and their fungal pathogens play an important role in the arms race between plants and pathogens, which has resulted in co-evolutionary diversification and adaptation shaping pathogen lifestyles.

Indexed as

chitinasecysteine proteasedefencemetalloproteaseprotease inhibitorserine protease

Identifiers

PMID26284100
PMCPMC4522555
OpenAlexW1736037187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.