Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26284019›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychology2015

Fifty psychological and psychiatric terms to avoid: a list of inaccurate, misleading, misused, ambiguous, and logically confused words and phrases.

Scott O Lilienfeld, Katheryn C Sauvigné, Steven Jay Lynn, Robin L Cautin, Robert D Latzman, Irwin D Waldman

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
12.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 125 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Enhancing Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Quantitative Studies of Age and Life Course.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2023
    Article
  11. Enhancing Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Quantitative Studies of Age and Life Course.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. The bystander effect in rats.Science advances · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Scott O LilienfeldDepartment of Psychology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA USA.
Katheryn C SauvignéDepartment of Psychology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA USA.
Steven Jay LynnBinghamton University - State University of New York, Binghamton, NY USA.
Robin L CautinDepartment of Psychology, Sacred Heart College, Fairfield, CT USA.
Robert D LatzmanDepartment of Psychology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA USA.
Irwin D WaldmanDepartment of Psychology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA USA.
Emory University · USGeorgia State University · USBinghamton University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of this article is to promote clear thinking and clear writing among students and teachers of psychological science by curbing terminological misinformation and confusion. To this end, we present a provisional list of 50 commonly used terms in psychology, psychiatry, and allied fields that should be avoided, or at most used sparingly and with explicit caveats. We provide corrective information for students, instructors, and researchers regarding these terms, which we organize for expository purposes into five categories: inaccurate or misleading terms, frequently misused terms, ambiguous terms, oxymorons, and pleonasms. For each term, we (a) explain why it is problematic, (b) delineate one or more examples of its misuse, and (c) when pertinent, offer recommendations for preferable terms. By being more judicious in their use of terminology, psychologists and psychiatrists can foster clearer thinking in their students and the field at large regarding mental phenomena.

Indexed as

jingle and jangle fallaciesmisconceptionsmisunderstandingsscientific thinkingterminology

Identifiers

PMID26284019
PMCPMC4522609
OpenAlexW1857274061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.