Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26283938›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience2015

GABAergic feedback signaling into the calyces of the mushroom bodies enables olfactory reversal learning in honey bees.

Constance Boitard, Jean-Marc Devaud, Guillaume Isabel, Martin Giurfa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. When a bigger brain is better: The case of bee olfactory learning.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cognitive limits of larvalLearning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Reversal learning inLearning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Constance BoitardResearch Center on Animal Cognition (UMR 5169), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) Toulouse, France ; Research Center on Animal Cognition (UMR 5169), Université Paul Sabatier Toulouse, France.
Jean-Marc DevaudResearch Center on Animal Cognition (UMR 5169), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) Toulouse, France ; Research Center on Animal Cognition (UMR 5169), Université Paul Sabatier Toulouse, France.
Guillaume IsabelResearch Center on Animal Cognition (UMR 5169), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) Toulouse, France ; Research Center on Animal Cognition (UMR 5169), Université Paul Sabatier Toulouse, France.
Martin GiurfaResearch Center on Animal Cognition (UMR 5169), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) Toulouse, France ; Research Center on Animal Cognition (UMR 5169), Université Paul Sabatier Toulouse, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In reversal learning, subjects first learn to respond to a reinforced stimulus A and not to a non-reinforced stimulus B (A(+) vs. B(-)) and then have to learn the opposite when stimulus contingencies are reversed (A(-) vs. B(+)). This change in stimulus valence generates a transitory ambiguity at the level of stimulus outcome that needs to be overcome to solve the second discrimination. Honey bees (Apis mellifera) efficiently master reversal learning in the olfactory domain. The mushroom bodies (MBs), higher-order structures of the insect brain, are required to solve this task. Here we aimed at uncovering the neural circuits facilitating reversal learning in honey bees. We trained bees using the olfactory conditioning of the proboscis extension reflex (PER) coupled with localized pharmacological inhibition of Gamma-AminoButyric Acid (GABA)ergic signaling in the MBs. We show that inhibition of ionotropic but not metabotropic GABAergic signaling into the MB calyces impairs reversal learning, but leaves intact the capacity to perform two consecutive elemental olfactory discriminations with ambiguity of stimulus valence. On the contrary, inhibition of ionotropic GABAergic signaling into the MB lobes had no effect on reversal learning. Our results are thus consistent with a specific requirement of the feedback neurons (FNs) providing ionotropic GABAergic signaling from the MB lobes to the calyces for counteracting ambiguity of stimulus valence in reversal learning.

Indexed as

GABAergic signalinghoney beesmushroom bodiesreversal learning

Identifiers

PMID26283938
PMCPMC4518197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.