Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26283935›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience2015

Visual rehabilitation: visual scanning, multisensory stimulation and vision restoration trainings.

Neil M Dundon, Caterina Bertini, Elisabetta Làdavas, Bernhard A Sabel, Carolin Gall

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Audio-visual stimulation for visual compensatory functions in stroke survivors with visual field defect: a systematic review.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Diagnosis and treatment of occipital brain lesions in children.Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Ameliorating Hemianopia with Multisensory Training.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Neil M DundonDepartment of Psychology, University of Bologna Bologna, Italy ; Centre for Studies and Research in Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Bologna Cesena, Italy.
Caterina BertiniDepartment of Psychology, University of Bologna Bologna, Italy ; Centre for Studies and Research in Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Bologna Cesena, Italy.
Elisabetta LàdavasDepartment of Psychology, University of Bologna Bologna, Italy ; Centre for Studies and Research in Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Bologna Cesena, Italy.
Bernhard A SabelMedical Faculty, Institute of Medical Psychology, Otto-von-Guericke University of Magdeburg Magdeburg, Germany.
Carolin GallMedical Faculty, Institute of Medical Psychology, Otto-von-Guericke University of Magdeburg Magdeburg, Germany.
University of Bologna · ITOtto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuropsychological training methods of visual rehabilitation for homonymous vision loss caused by postchiasmatic damage fall into two fundamental paradigms: "compensation" and "restoration". Existing methods can be classified into three groups: Visual Scanning Training (VST), Audio-Visual Scanning Training (AViST) and Vision Restoration Training (VRT). VST and AViST aim at compensating vision loss by training eye scanning movements, whereas VRT aims at improving lost vision by activating residual visual functions by training light detection and discrimination of visual stimuli. This review discusses the rationale underlying these paradigms and summarizes the available evidence with respect to treatment efficacy. The issues raised in our review should help guide clinical care and stimulate new ideas for future research uncovering the underlying neural correlates of the different treatment paradigms. We propose that both local "within-system" interactions (i.e., relying on plasticity within peri-lesional spared tissue) and changes in more global "between-system" networks (i.e., recruiting alternative visual pathways) contribute to both vision restoration and compensatory rehabilitation, which ultimately have implications for the rehabilitation of cognitive functions.

Indexed as

audio-visual traininghemianopianeural plasticityvision restoration trainingvisual scanning training

Identifiers

PMID26283935
PMCPMC4515568
OpenAlexW1571648074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.