Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26283864›Full record

ArticleMolecular vision2015

Characterization of ex vivo cultured limbal, conjunctival, and oral mucosal cells: A comparative study with implications in transplantation medicine.

Kamesh Dhamodaran, Murali Subramani, Nallathambi Jeyabalan, Murugeswari Ponnalagu, Priyanka Chevour, Reshma Shetty, Himanshu Matalia, Rohit Shetty, Sabina Evan Prince, Debashish Das

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular vision, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Corneal stromal regeneration-keratoconus cell therapy: a review.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023
    Review
  5. Autophagy in the normal and diseased cornea.Experimental eye research · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Comparison of the efficacy of different cell sources for transplantation in total limbal stem cell deficiency.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2019
    Article
  12. Characterization of Corneal Epithelial Cells in Keratoconus.Translational vision science & technology · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kamesh DhamodaranStem Cell Research Laboratory, GROW Research Laboratory, Narayana Nethralaya Foundation, Bangalore, Karnataka, India ; School of Biosciences and Technology, VIT University, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Murali SubramaniStem Cell Research Laboratory, GROW Research Laboratory, Narayana Nethralaya Foundation, Bangalore, Karnataka, India ; Post-graduate & Research Department of Biotechnology, Jamal Mohamed College, Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli, India.
Nallathambi JeyabalanGROW Research Laboratory, Narayana Nethralaya Foundation, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Murugeswari PonnalaguStem Cell Research Laboratory, GROW Research Laboratory, Narayana Nethralaya Foundation, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Priyanka ChevourGROW Research Laboratory, Narayana Nethralaya Foundation, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Reshma ShettyStem Cell Research Laboratory, GROW Research Laboratory, Narayana Nethralaya Foundation, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Himanshu MataliaDepartment of Cornea and Refractive surgery, Narayana Nethralaya Post Graduate Institute of Ophthalmology, Narayana Nethralaya Foundation, Narayana Health City, Bommasandra, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Rohit ShettyDepartment of Cornea and Refractive surgery, Narayana Nethralaya Post Graduate Institute of Ophthalmology, Narayana Nethralaya Foundation, Narayana Health City, Bommasandra, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Sabina Evan PrinceSchool of Biosciences and Technology, VIT University, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Debashish DasStem Cell Research Laboratory, GROW Research Laboratory, Narayana Nethralaya Foundation, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Narayana Nethralaya · INVellore Institute of Technology University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLimbal epithelial stem cell deficiency is caused by exposure of the cornea to thermal, chemical, or radiation burns or by diseases (aniridia and Stevens-Johnson syndrome). Autologous cell transplantation is a widely used therapeutic modality for restoring the corneal surface in such pathological conditions. Ex vivo cultured limbal, conjunctival, and oral biopsies have been widely used to reconstruct the corneal surface with variable outcomes. Culture characterization of the ex vivo cultured cells would provide insight and clues into the underlying signaling mechanisms that would aid in determining the probable transplantation outcome. Comparison of the vital proteins and genes among the three ex vivo cultured tissues has implications in clinical practice. To address this issue, we characterized and compared the proliferative and differentiated properties of ex vivo cultured limbal, conjunctival, and oral biopsies used for cell-based therapy for corneal surface restoration.

methodsLimbal, conjunctival, and oral biopsies were collected with informed patient consent. Explant cultures were established on the denuded human amniotic membrane with corneal lineage differentiation medium. The day 14 cultures were characterized for epithelial and corneal lineage-specific markers using reverse transcription (RT)-PCR for cytokeratin 3, 4, 12, 13, 15, connexin 43, vimentin, p63α, and ABCG2 markers. mRNA expression was estimated in day 14 cultures with real-time quantitative real time (qRT)-PCR for pluripotency markers (OCT4, SOX2, NANOG), putative corneal stem cell markers (ABCG2 and p63α), proliferation markers (cyclin d1, Ki-67, PCNA, and CDC20), apoptotic markers (BCL2, BAX, caspase 3, and caspase 9), Notch signaling pathway markers (Notch1, Jagged1, Hes1, Hes3, Hes5, and Hey1), and autophagic markers (LC3A, LC3B, ATG7, RAB7, LAMP1, and LAMP2). Fluorescence-activated cell sorter profiling was performed for pluripotent markers and putative corneal stem cell markers ABCG2 and p63α.

resultsThe protein and mRNA expression levels of the pluripotent markers were lower, whereas those of the putative stem/progenitor markers ABCG2, ΔNp63α, and Notch signaling molecules (Notch1 and Jagged1) were elevated in limbal cultures. The gene expression levels of the autophagy markers (LC3A, LC3B, and LAMP1) were significantly increased in the limbal cultures compared to the oral and conjunctival cultures.

conclusionsIn conclusion, the limbal epithelial cultures showed higher expression of proliferative, limbal stem cell marker, Notch signaling, and autophagy markers suggesting a role in stem cell maintenance and differentiation. This implicates the probable factors that might drive a successful transplantation. Our findings provide the initial steps toward understanding transplantation medicine in an ex vivo model.

Indexed as

Cell- and Tissue-Based TherapyCell Culture TechniquesCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationCells, CulturedCell TransplantationConjunctivaCorneal DiseasesGene ExpressionHumansIn Vitro TechniquesLimbus CorneaeMouth MucosaRNA, MessengerStem CellsRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID26283864
PMCPMC4522244
OpenAlexW1502380141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.