Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26283713›Full record

ArticleTobacco control2016

Quitting smoking before and after varenicline: a population study based on two representative samples of US smokers.

Shu-Hong Zhu, Sharon E Cummins, Anthony C Gamst, Shiushing Wong, Tyson Ikeda

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco control, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of Web-Delivered Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Versus Smokefree.gov for Smokers With Bipolar Disorder.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shu-Hong ZhuMoores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, California, USA.
Sharon E CumminsMoores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, California, USA.
Anthony C GamstMoores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, California, USA.
Shiushing WongMoores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, California, USA.
Tyson IkedaMoores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, California, USA.
University of California, San Diego · US

Funding

Nonsmokers and Tobacco Control Norms: Population Surveys and Intervention StudiesU01CA154280 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ZHU, SHU-HONG · 2011 to 2015
$7.9M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA154280
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVarenicline is known to have greater efficacy than other pharmacotherapy for treating nicotine dependence and has gained popularity since its introduction in 2006. This study examines if adding varenicline to existing pharmacotherapies increased the population cessation rate.

methodsData are from two cross-sectional US Current Population Surveys-Tobacco Use Supplements (2003 and 2010-2011). Smokers and recent quitters 18 or older (N=34 869 in 2003, N=27 751 in 2010-2011) were asked if they had used varenicline, bupropion or nicotine replacement therapies (NRT) in their most recent quit attempt. The annual cessation rate, as well as the per cent of smokers who had quit for ≥3 months, was compared between surveys.

resultsVarenicline use increased from 0% in 2003 to 10.9% in 2010-2011, while use of bupropion decreased from 9.1% to 3.5%, and NRT from 24.5% to 22.4%. Use of any pharmacotherapy increased by 2.4 percentage points. Varenicline users stayed on cessation aids longer and were less likely to relapse than users of other pharmacotherapies in the first 3 months of a quit attempt, after which the difference was no longer significant. The change in annual cessation rate was negligible, from 4.5% in 2003 to 4.7% in 2010-2011 (p=0.36).

conclusionsAddition of varenicline to the list of approved cessation aids has mainly led to displacement of other therapies. As a result, there was no meaningful change in population cessation rate despite a remarkable increase in varenicline use. The population impact of a new therapy is a function of more than efficacy or reach of the therapy.

Indexed as

Tobacco Use Cessation DevicesAdolescentAdultAgedBupropionCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNicotinic AgonistsRecurrenceSmokersSmoking CessationSurveys and QuestionnairesTime FactorsBupropionNicotinic AgonistsVareniclineCessationHealth ServicesNicotine

Identifiers

PMID26283713
PMCPMC4757510
OpenAlexW2163833944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.