Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26283638›Full record

ArticleMolecular psychiatry2015

Understanding and predicting suicidality using a combined genomic and clinical risk assessment approach.

A B Niculescu, D F Levey, P L Phalen, H Le-Niculescu, H D Dainton, N Jain, E Belanger, A James, S George, H Weber and 19 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular psychiatry, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
15.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 168 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Research progress of kinesin family in neurological diseases.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Navigating the Intersection of Technology and Depression Precision Medicine.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

A B NiculescuDepartment of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
D F LeveyDepartment of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
P L PhalenIndianapolis VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
H Le-NiculescuDepartment of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
H D DaintonDepartment of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
N JainDepartment of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
E BelangerIndianapolis VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
A JamesIndianapolis VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
S GeorgeIndianapolis VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
H WeberIndianapolis VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
D L GrahamDepartment of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
R SchweitzerDepartment of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
T B LaddDepartment of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
R LearmanDepartment of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
E M NiculescuDepartment of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
N P VanipentaDepartment of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
F N KhanDepartment of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
J MullenAdvanced Biomedical IT Core, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
G ShankarAdvanced Biomedical IT Core, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
S CookMarion County Coroner's Office, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
C HumbertMarion County Coroner's Office, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
A BallewMarion County Coroner's Office, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
M YardINBRAIN, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
T GelbartDepartment of Molecular and Experimental Medicine, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA.
A ShekharDepartment of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
N J SchorkJ. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA.
S M KurianDepartment of Molecular and Experimental Medicine, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA.
G E SanduskyINBRAIN, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
D R SalomonDepartment of Molecular and Experimental Medicine, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USIndiana University School of MedicineHamilton County Coroner · USScripps Research Institute · USJ. Craig Venter Institute · US

Funding

Developing Blood Tests for Mood DisordersDP2OD007363 · OD · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI NICULESCU, ALEXANDER B · 2010 to 2010
$2.3M
Mood State Blood Biomarkers: A Discovery-Based ApproachI01CX000139 · VA · RLR VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI NICULESCU, ALEXANDER B · 2009 to 2017
–
CSRD VA I01 CX000139NIH HHS 1DP2OD007363NIH HHS DP2 OD007363
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Worldwide, one person dies every 40 seconds by suicide, a potentially preventable tragedy. A limiting step in our ability to intervene is the lack of objective, reliable predictors. We have previously provided proof of principle for the use of blood gene expression biomarkers to predict future hospitalizations due to suicidality, in male bipolar disorder participants. We now generalize the discovery, prioritization, validation, and testing of such markers across major psychiatric disorders (bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, schizoaffective disorder, and schizophrenia) in male participants, to understand commonalities and differences. We used a powerful within-participant discovery approach to identify genes that change in expression between no suicidal ideation and high suicidal ideation states (n=37 participants out of a cohort of 217 psychiatric participants followed longitudinally). We then used a convergent functional genomics (CFG) approach with existing prior evidence in the field to prioritize the candidate biomarkers identified in the discovery step. Next, we validated the top biomarkers from the prioritization step for relevance to suicidal behavior, in a demographically matched cohort of suicide completers from the coroner's office (n=26). The biomarkers for suicidal ideation only are enriched for genes involved in neuronal connectivity and schizophrenia, the biomarkers also validated for suicidal behavior are enriched for genes involved in neuronal activity and mood. The 76 biomarkers that survived Bonferroni correction after validation for suicidal behavior map to biological pathways involved in immune and inflammatory response, mTOR signaling and growth factor regulation. mTOR signaling is necessary for the effects of the rapid-acting antidepressant agent ketamine, providing a novel biological rationale for its possible use in treating acute suicidality. Similarly, MAOB, a target of antidepressant inhibitors, was one of the increased biomarkers for suicidality. We also identified other potential therapeutic targets or biomarkers for drugs known to mitigate suicidality, such as omega-3 fatty acids, lithium and clozapine. Overall, 14% of the top candidate biomarkers also had evidence for involvement in psychological stress response, and 19% for involvement in programmed cell death/cellular suicide (apoptosis). It may be that in the face of adversity (stress), death mechanisms are turned on at a cellular (apoptosis) and organismal level. Finally, we tested the top increased and decreased biomarkers from the discovery for suicidal ideation (CADM1, CLIP4, DTNA, KIF2C), prioritization with CFG for prior evidence (SAT1, SKA2, SLC4A4), and validation for behavior in suicide completers (IL6, MBP, JUN, KLHDC3) steps in a completely independent test cohort of psychiatric participants for prediction of suicidal ideation (n=108), and in a future follow-up cohort of psychiatric participants (n=157) for prediction of psychiatric hospitalizations due to suicidality. The best individual biomarker across psychiatric diagnoses for predicting suicidal ideation was SLC4A4, with a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) of 72%. For bipolar disorder in particular, SLC4A4 predicted suicidal ideation with an AUC of 93%, and future hospitalizations with an AUC of 70%. SLC4A4 is involved in brain extracellular space pH regulation. Brain pH has been implicated in the pathophysiology of acute panic attacks. We also describe two new clinical information apps, one for affective state (simplified affective state scale, SASS) and one for suicide risk factors (Convergent Functional Information for Suicide, CFI-S), and how well they predict suicidal ideation across psychiatric diagnoses (AUC of 85% for SASS, AUC of 89% for CFI-S). We hypothesized a priori, based on our previous work, that the integration of the top biomarkers and the clinical information into a universal predictive measure (UP-Suicide) would show broad-spectrum predictive ability across psychiatric diagnoses. Indeed, the UP-Suicide was able to predict suicidal ideation across psychiatric diagnoses with an AUC of 92%. For bipolar disorder, it predicted suicidal ideation with an AUC of 98%, and future hospitalizations with an AUC of 94%. Of note, both types of tests we developed (blood biomarkers and clinical information apps) do not require asking the individual assessed if they have thoughts of suicide, as individuals who are truly suicidal often do not share that information with clinicians. We propose that the widespread use of such risk prediction tests as part of routine or targeted healthcare assessments will lead to early disease interception followed by preventive lifestyle modifications and proactive treatment.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersSuicideAdultBiomarkersCohort StudiesDatabases, GeneticFemaleGene ExpressionGene Expression ProfilingGenomicsHumansMaleMiddle AgedOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPredictive Value of TestsPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID26283638
PMCPMC4759104
OpenAlexW2164971547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.