ArticleBMC genomics2015
BEACON: automated tool for Bacterial GEnome Annotation ComparisON.
Article in BMC genomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- StORF-Reporter: finding genes between genes.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- StandEnA: a customizable workflow for standardized annotation and generating a presence-absence matrix of proteins.Bioinformatics advances · 2023Article
- Pseudofinder: Detection of Pseudogenes in Prokaryotic Genomes.Molecular biology and evolution · 2022Article
- Construction and Analysis of the Complete Genome Sequence of Leprosy Agent Mycobacterium lepromatosis.Microbiology spectrum · 2022Article
- Metascan: METabolic Analysis, SCreening and ANnotation of Metagenomes.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Evolution ofPeerJ · 2022Article
- Genome-resolved metagenomics using environmental and clinical samples.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2021Review
- Genome annotation of disease-causing microorganisms.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2021Review
- Article
- Article
- Nitrate Respiration inGenes · 2020Review
- Review on the Computational Genome Annotation of Sequences Obtained by Next-Generation Sequencing.Biology · 2020Review
- Cultivation-Assisted Genome of Candidatus Fukatsuia symbiotica; the Enigmatic "X-Type" Symbiont of Aphids.Genome biology and evolution · 2019Article
- SamPler - a novel method for selecting parameters for gene functional annotation routines.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- Genome-wide identification, characterization, interaction network and expression profile ofPeerJ · 2019Article
- Complete Genome Sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2019Article
- Culture-Facilitated Comparative Genomics of the Facultative Symbiont Hamiltonella defensa.Genome biology and evolution · 2018Article
- SLALOM, a flexible method for the identification and statistical analysis of overlapping continuous sequence elements in sequence- and time-series data.BMC bioinformatics · 2018Article
- Network Analyses in Plant Pathogens.Frontiers in microbiology · 2018Review
- Using bacterial genomes and essential genes for the development of new antibiotics.Biochemical pharmacology · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGenome annotation is one way of summarizing the existing knowledge about genomic characteristics of an organism. There has been an increased interest during the last several decades in computer-based structural and functional genome annotation. Many methods for this purpose have been developed for eukaryotes and prokaryotes. Our study focuses on comparison of functional annotations of prokaryotic genomes. To the best of our knowledge there is no fully automated system for detailed comparison of functional genome annotations generated by different annotation methods (AMs).
resultsThe presence of many AMs and development of new ones introduce needs to: a/ compare different annotations for a single genome, and b/ generate annotation by combining individual ones. To address these issues we developed an Automated Tool for Bacterial GEnome Annotation ComparisON (BEACON) that benefits both AM developers and annotation analysers. BEACON provides detailed comparison of gene function annotations of prokaryotic genomes obtained by different AMs and generates extended annotations through combination of individual ones. For the illustration of BEACON's utility, we provide a comparison analysis of multiple different annotations generated for four genomes and show on these examples that the extended annotation can increase the number of genes annotated by putative functions up to 27%, while the number of genes without any function assignment is reduced.
conclusionsWe developed BEACON, a fast tool for an automated and a systematic comparison of different annotations of single genomes. The extended annotation assigns putative functions to many genes with unknown functions. BEACON is available under GNU General Public License version 3.0 and is accessible at: http://www.cbrc.kaust.edu.sa/BEACON/ .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.