Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26283378›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015

Hybrid mimics and hybrid vigor in Arabidopsis.

Li Wang, Ian K Greaves, Michael Groszmann, Li Min Wu, Elizabeth S Dennis, W James Peacock

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Molecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Li WangAgriculture, Commonwealth Scientific Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia;
Ian K GreavesAgriculture, Commonwealth Scientific Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia;
Michael GroszmannAgriculture, Commonwealth Scientific Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia;
Li Min WuAgriculture, Commonwealth Scientific Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia;
Elizabeth S DennisAgriculture, Commonwealth Scientific Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia; Faculty of Science, University of Technology, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia.
W James PeacockAgriculture, Commonwealth Scientific Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia; Faculty of Science, University of Technology, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia jim.peacock@csiro.au.
Plant Industry · AUUniversity of Technology Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

F1 hybrids can outperform their parents in yield and vegetative biomass, features of hybrid vigor that form the basis of the hybrid seed industry. The yield advantage of the F1 is lost in the F2 and subsequent generations. In Arabidopsis, from F2 plants that have a F1-like phenotype, we have by recurrent selection produced pure breeding F5/F6 lines, hybrid mimics, in which the characteristics of the F1 hybrid are stabilized. These hybrid mimic lines, like the F1 hybrid, have larger leaves than the parent plant, and the leaves have increased photosynthetic cell numbers, and in some lines, increased size of cells, suggesting an increased supply of photosynthate. A comparison of the differentially expressed genes in the F1 hybrid with those of eight hybrid mimic lines identified metabolic pathways altered in both; these pathways include down-regulation of defense response pathways and altered abiotic response pathways. F6 hybrid mimic lines are mostly homozygous at each locus in the genome and yet retain the large F1-like phenotype. Many alleles in the F6 plants, when they are homozygous, have expression levels different to the level in the parent. We consider this altered expression to be a consequence of transregulation of genes from one parent by genes from the other parent. Transregulation could also arise from epigenetic modifications in the F1. The pure breeding hybrid mimics have been valuable in probing the mechanisms of hybrid vigor and may also prove to be useful hybrid vigor equivalents in agriculture.

Indexed as

Hybrid VigorArabidopsisGene Expression ProfilingGenes, PlantHomozygotePlant LeavesPolymorphism, Single NucleotideepigeneticsheterosisTCMtranscriptometransregulation

Identifiers

PMID26283378
PMCPMC4568211
OpenAlexW2113435971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.