Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26283348›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015

Endosymbionts escape dead hydrothermal vent tubeworms to enrich the free-living population.

Julia Klose, Martin F Polz, Michael Wagner, Mario P Schimak, Sabine Gollner, Monika Bright

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Julia KloseDepartment of Limnology and Bio-Oceanography, University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria;
Martin F PolzParsons Laboratory for Environmental Science and Engineering, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139;
Michael WagnerDepartment of Microbiology and Ecosystem Science, University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria;
Mario P SchimakDepartment of Limnology and Bio-Oceanography, University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria; Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, 28359 Bremen, Germany;
Sabine GollnerDepartment of Limnology and Bio-Oceanography, University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria; Department of Ecosystem Studies, Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research (NIOZ), 4401 NT Yerseke, The Netherlands; German Center for Marine Biodiversity Research, Senckenberg am Meer, 26382 Wilhelmshaven, Germany.
Monika BrightDepartment of Limnology and Bio-Oceanography, University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria; monika.bright@univie.ac.at.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Theory predicts that horizontal acquisition of symbionts by plants and animals must be coupled to release and limited dispersal of symbionts for intergenerational persistence of mutualisms. For deep-sea hydrothermal vent tubeworms (Vestimentifera, Siboglinidae), it has been demonstrated that a few symbiotic bacteria infect aposymbiotic host larvae and grow in a newly formed organ, the trophosome. However, whether viable symbionts can be released to augment environmental populations has been doubtful, because (i) the adult worms lack obvious openings and (ii) the vast majority of symbionts has been regarded as terminally differentiated. Here we show experimentally that symbionts rapidly escape their hosts upon death and recruit to surfaces where they proliferate. Estimating symbiont release from our experiments taken together with well-known tubeworm density ranges, we suggest a few million to 1.5 billion symbionts seeding the environment upon death of a tubeworm clump. In situ observations show that such clumps have rapid turnover, suggesting that release of large numbers of symbionts may ensure effective dispersal to new sites followed by active larval colonization. Moreover, release of symbionts might enable adaptations that evolve within host individuals to spread within host populations and possibly to new environments.

Indexed as

SymbiosisAnimalsBacteriaBacterial LoadCell DeathEnvironmental MicrobiologyHost-Pathogen InteractionsHydrothermal VentsIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceLarvaMicroscopy, Electron, TransmissionPolychaetaRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSeawaterRNA, Ribosomal, 16Smutualism stabilitysymbiont seedingsymbiosistubewormsVestimentifera

Identifiers

PMID26283348
PMCPMC4568656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.