Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26282710›Full record

ArticleJournal of cellular and molecular medicine2015

Invasive surgery reduces infarct size and preserves cardiac function in a porcine model of myocardial infarction.

Gerardus P J van Hout, Michel P J Teuben, Marjolein Heeres, Steven de Maat, Renate de Jong, Coen Maas, Lisanne H J A Kouwenberg, Leo Koenderman, Wouter W van Solinge, Saskia C A de Jager and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cellular and molecular medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Development of a new model for acute myocardial infarction in rabbits.The Journal of veterinary medical science · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gerardus P J van HoutExperimental Cardiology Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Michel P J TeubenDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Marjolein HeeresDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Steven de MaatDepartment of Clinical Chemistry and Hematology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Renate de JongDepartment of Anesthesiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Coen MaasDepartment of Clinical Chemistry and Hematology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Lisanne H J A KouwenbergExperimental Cardiology Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Leo KoendermanDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Wouter W van SolingeDepartment of Clinical Chemistry and Hematology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Saskia C A de JagerExperimental Cardiology Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Gerard PasterkampExperimental Cardiology Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Imo E HoeferExperimental Cardiology Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLErasmus MC · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reperfusion injury following myocardial infarction (MI) increases infarct size (IS) and deteriorates cardiac function. Cardioprotective strategies in large animal MI models often failed in clinical trials, suggesting translational failure. Experimentally, MI is induced artificially and the effect of the experimental procedures may influence outcome and thus clinical applicability. The aim of this study was to investigate if invasive surgery, as in the common open chest MI model affects IS and cardiac function. Twenty female landrace pigs were subjected to MI by transluminal balloon occlusion. In 10 of 20 pigs, balloon occlusion was preceded by invasive surgery (medial sternotomy). After 72 hrs, pigs were subjected to echocardiography and Evans blue/triphenyl tetrazoliumchloride double staining to determine IS and area at risk. Quantification of IS showed a significant IS reduction in the open chest group compared to the closed chest group (IS versus area at risk: 50.9 ± 5.4% versus 69.9 ± 3.4%, P = 0.007). End systolic LV volume and LV ejection fraction measured by echocardiography at follow-up differed significantly between both groups (51 ± 5 ml versus 65 ± 3 ml, P = 0.033; 47.5 ± 2.6% versus 38.8 ± 1.2%, P = 0.005). The inflammatory response in the damaged myocardium did not differ between groups. This study indicates that invasive surgery reduces IS and preserves cardiac function in a porcine MI model. Future studies need to elucidate the effect of infarct induction technique on the efficacy of pharmacological therapies in large animal cardioprotection studies.

Indexed as

AnimalsDisease Models, AnimalEchocardiographyFemaleHeartMyocardial InfarctionMyocardial Reperfusion InjuryMyocardiumRecovery of FunctionSwinecardioprotectioninfarct size reductioninvasive surgerylarge animal modelsmyocardial infarction

Identifiers

PMID26282710
PMCPMC4627570
OpenAlexW2171383829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.