Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26282683›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2015

Identification of in vitro and in vivo disconnects using transcriptomic data.

Martin Otava, Ziv Shkedy, Willem Talloen, Geert R Verheyen, Adetayo Kasim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Brief update on endocytosis of nanomedicines.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2019
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Transcriptomics in toxicology.Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Martin OtavaInteruniversity Institute for Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics, Hasselt University, Martelarenlaan 32, Hasselt, 3500, Belgium. martin.otava@uhasselt.be.
Ziv ShkedyInteruniversity Institute for Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics, Hasselt University, Martelarenlaan 32, Hasselt, 3500, Belgium. ziv.shkedy@uhasselt.be.
Willem TalloenJanssen, Pharmaceutical companies of Johnson & Johnson, Turnhoutseweg 30, Beerse, 2340, Belgium. WTALLOEN@its.jnj.com.
Geert R VerheyenThomas More Kempen, Geel, 2440, Belgium. Geert.Verheyen@thomasmore.be.
Adetayo KasimWolfson Research Institute for Health and Wellbeing, Durham University, University Boulevard, TS17 6BH Thornaby, Stockton-on-Tees, UK. a.s.kasim@durham.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntegrating transcriptomic experiments within drug development is increasingly advocated for the early detection of toxicity. This is partly to reduce costs related to drug failures in the late, and expensive phases of clinical trials. Such an approach has proven useful both in the study of toxicology and carcinogenicity. However, general lack of translation of in vitro findings to in vivo systems remains one of the bottle necks in drug development. This paper proposes a method for identifying disconnected genes between in vitro and in vivo toxicogenomic rat experiments. The analytical framework is based on the joint modeling of dose-dependent in vitro and in vivo data using a fractional polynomial framework and biclustering algorithm.

resultsMost disconnected genes identified belonged to known pathways, such as drug metabolism and oxidative stress due to reactive metabolites, bilirubin increase, glutathion depletion and phospholipidosis. We also identified compounds that were likely to induce disconnect in gene expression between in vitro and in vivo toxicogenomic rat experiments. These compounds include: sulindac and diclofenac (both linked to liver damage), naphtyl isothiocyanate (linked to hepatoxocity), indomethacin and naproxen (linked to gastrointestinal problem and damage of intestines).

conclusionThe results confirmed that there are important discrepancies between in vitro and in vivo toxicogenomic experiments. However, the contribution of this paper is to provide a tool to identify genes that are disconnected between the two systems. Pathway analysis of disconnected genes may improve our understanding of uncertainties in the mechanism of actions of drug candidates in humans, especially concerning the early detection of toxicity.

Indexed as

Drug Evaluation, PreclinicalTranscriptomeAlgorithmsAnimalsCluster AnalysisDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsIn Vitro TechniquesModels, ChemicalRatsToxicogenetics

Identifiers

PMID26282683
PMCPMC4539666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.