Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26282426›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2015

Optimizing the initial amikacin dosage in adults.

Bryan P White, Ben Lomaestro, Manjunath P Pai

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Surface-functionalized UIO-66-NHBMC microbiology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Reply to Baud and Houzé, "ShouldAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Amikacin: Uses, Resistance, and Prospects for Inhibition.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017
    Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bryan P WhiteAlbany Medical Center, Albany, New York, USA.
Ben LomaestroAlbany Medical Center, Albany, New York, USA.
Manjunath P PaiAlbany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Albany, New York, USA amit.pai@acphs.edu.
Albany Medical Center Hospital · USAlbany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report on the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of high-dose (>15 mg/kg of body weight per day) amikacin. A mean (standard deviation [SD]) maximum drug concentration in the serum (Cmax) and 24-h area under the concentration-time curve (AUC24) of 101 (49.4) mg/liter and 600 (387) mg · h/liter, respectively, were observed (n = 73) with 28.0 (8.47) mg/kg/day doses. An initial amikacin dose of 2,500 mg in adults weighing 40 kg to 200 kg with therapeutic drug monitoring to adjust the maintenance dose will optimize its PK and PD.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAmikacinAnti-Bacterial AgentsArea Under CurveFemaleHumansMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedAmikacinAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID26282426
PMCPMC4604368
OpenAlexW1813312601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.