Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26282425›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2015

HIV drug resistance testing by high-multiplex "wide" sequencing on the MiSeq instrument.

H R Lapointe, W Dong, G Q Lee, D R Bangsberg, J N Martin, A R Mocello, Y Boum, A Karakas, D Kirkby, A F Y Poon and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Diagnosis of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

H R LapointeBritish Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, Canada.
W DongBritish Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, Canada.
G Q LeeBritish Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, Canada.
D R BangsbergHarvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Mbarara University of Science of Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.
J N MartinUniversity of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
A R MocelloUniversity of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Y BoumMbarara University of Science of Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.
A KarakasBritish Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, Canada.
D KirkbyBritish Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, Canada.
A F Y PoonBritish Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, Canada University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
P R HarriganBritish Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, Canada University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada prharrigan@cfenet.ubc.ca cbrumme@cfenet.ubc.ca.
C J BrummeBritish Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, Canada prharrigan@cfenet.ubc.ca cbrumme@cfenet.ubc.ca.

Funding

Virology CoreP30AI027763 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI STEVEN Grant DEEKS · 1988 to 2026
$93.6M
AIDS and Cancer Specimen Resource (ACSR)UM1CA181255 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Jeffrey Michael Bethony, Anna Coghill · 2013 to 2026
$56.7M
NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA181255NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI027763
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Limited access to HIV drug resistance testing in low- and middle-income countries impedes clinical decision-making at the individual patient level. An efficient protocol to address this issue must be established to minimize negative therapeutic outcomes for HIV-1-infected individuals in such settings. This is an observational study to ascertain the potential of newer genomic sequencing platforms, such as the Illumina MiSeq instrument, to provide accurate HIV drug resistance genotypes for hundreds of samples simultaneously. Plasma samples were collected from Canadian patients during routine drug resistance testing (n = 759) and from a Ugandan study cohort (n = 349). Amplicons spanning HIV reverse transcriptase codons 90 to 234 were sequenced with both MiSeq sequencing and conventional Sanger sequencing methods. Sequences were evaluated for nucleotide concordance between methods, using coverage and mixture parameters for quality control. Consensus sequences were also analyzed for disparities in the identification of drug resistance mutations. Sanger and MiSeq sequencing was successful for 881 samples (80%) and 892 samples (81%), respectively, with 832 samples having results from both methods. Most failures were for samples with viral loads of <3.0 log10 HIV RNA copies/ml. Overall, 99.3% nucleotide concordance between methods was observed. MiSeq sequencing achieved 97.4% sensitivity and 99.3% specificity in detecting resistance mutations identified by Sanger sequencing. Findings suggest that the Illumina MiSeq platform can yield high-quality data with a high-multiplex "wide" sequencing approach. This strategy can be used for multiple HIV subtypes, demonstrating the potential for widespread individual testing and annual population surveillance in resource-limited settings.

Indexed as

CanadaDrug Resistance, ViralGenotyping TechniquesHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHIV-1HIV Reverse TranscriptaseHumansViral LoadHIV Reverse Transcriptase

Identifiers

PMID26282425
PMCPMC4604392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.