ArticleGenome biology2015
Response to Hron et al.
Article in Genome biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sequencing refractory regions in bird genomes are hotspots for accelerated protein evolution.BMC ecology and evolution · 2021Article
- Exploring the unmapped DNA and RNA reads in a songbird genome.BMC genomics · 2019Article
- Revisiting avian 'missing' genes from de novo assembled transcripts.BMC genomics · 2019Article
- Avian genomics lends insights into endocrine function in birds.General and comparative endocrinology · 2018Review
- Chicken Is a Useful Model to Investigate the Role of Adipokines in Metabolic and Reproductive Diseases.International journal of endocrinology · 2018Review
- Correspondence on Lovell et al.: response to Bornelöv et al.Genome biology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
- Comment on
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hron et al. provide transcriptome evidence that three (1.1 %) of the 274 genes reported by Lovell et al. as missing in birds may actually be 'hidden' as a result of high GC content. Although this factor may explain some gene absences from genomic assemblies, we believe it is insufficient to account for the extensive syntenic losses described in Lovell et al. Please see related article: www.dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13059-015-0724-z.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.