Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26281759›Full record

ArticleNeurobiology of aging2015

Head west or left, east or right: interactions between memory systems in neurocognitive aging.

Inês Tomás Pereira, Michela Gallagher, Peter R Rapp

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurobiology of aging, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. 'Arc'-hitecture of normal cognitive aging.Ageing research reviews · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Aging is not equal across memory systems.Neurobiology of learning and memory · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Age-Related Alterations in Prelimbic Cortical NeuronFrontiers in aging neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Is PASA Passé?: Rethinking Compensatory Mechanisms in Cognitive Aging.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Inês Tomás PereiraNeurocognitive Aging Section, Laboratory of Behavioral Neuroscience, National Institute on Aging, NIH, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Michela GallagherDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Peter R RappNeurocognitive Aging Section, Laboratory of Behavioral Neuroscience, National Institute on Aging, NIH, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: rappp@mail.nih.gov.
National Institute on Aging · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

TRANSCRIPTIONAL MECHANISMS OF HIPPOCAMPAL AGINGP01AG009973 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Alfredo Kirkwood · 1991 to 2026
$52.4M
Neurocognitive Aging: Experience-Dependent Dynamics, Plasticity and Network ContributionsZIAAG000350 · NIA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING · PI RAPP, PETER R · 2009 to 2025
$30.9M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 AG999999NIA NIH HHS AG09973NIA NIH HHS P01 AG009973
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive aging is accompanied by decline in multiple domains of memory. Here, we developed a T-maze task that required rats to learn competing hippocampal, and striatal navigation strategies in succession, across days. A final session increased demands on cognitive flexibility and required within-day switching between strategies, emphasizing capacities that engage the prefrontal cortex. Background characterization in young and aged rats used a water maze protocol optimized for individual differences in hippocampal integrity. Consistent with earlier work, young adults acquired place strategies in the T-maze faster than response, whereas the opposite was observed in aged rats with impaired spatial memory. The novel result was that aged animals with preserved spatial memory displayed a qualitatively distinct pattern, acquiring place and response strategies equally rapidly, without disruption when switching between them. Subsequent in situ hybridization for the plasticity-related immediate-early gene Arc revealed that while increasing demands on cognitive flexibility and within-day strategy switching potently engaged the prefrontal cortex in young adult and aged-impaired rats, Arc expression was insensitive in aged rats with normal spatial memory and superior switching abilities. Together, the results indicate that cognitive aging is an emergent property of the interactions between memory systems, and that successful cognitive outcomes reflect a distinct neuroadaptive process rather than a slower rate of aging.

Indexed as

AgingAnimalsCognitionCytoskeletal ProteinsGenes, Immediate-EarlyHippocampusMaleMaze LearningNerve Tissue ProteinsPrefrontal CortexRats, Long-EvansSpatial MemorySpatial Navigationactivity regulated cytoskeletal-associated proteinCytoskeletal ProteinsNerve Tissue ProteinsArcHippocampusMemory systemsNeuroadaptive agingPrefrontal cortexRat

Identifiers

PMID26281759
PMCPMC5843194
OpenAlexW1914062123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.