Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26281720›Full record

ReviewBiotechnology advances2015

Discovery and resupply of pharmacologically active plant-derived natural products: A review.

Atanas G Atanasov, Birgit Waltenberger, Eva-Maria Pferschy-Wenzig, Thomas Linder, Christoph Wawrosch, Pavel Uhrin, Veronika Temml, Limei Wang, Stefan Schwaiger, Elke H Heiss and 9 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biotechnology advances, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 955 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
955citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

955 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

895 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Atanas G Atanasov *Department of Pharmacognosy, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Birgit Waltenberger *Institute of Pharmacy/Pharmacognosy and Center for Molecular Biosciences Innsbruck (CMBI), University of Innsbruck, Innrain 80-82, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Eva-Maria Pferschy-Wenzig *Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Pharmacognosy, University of Graz, Universitätsplatz 4/I, 8010 Graz, Austria.
Thomas LinderInstitute of Applied Synthetic Chemistry, Vienna University of Technology, Getreidemarkt 9/163-OC, 1060 Vienna, Austria.
Christoph WawroschDepartment of Pharmacognosy, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Pavel UhrinInstitute of Vascular Biology and Thrombosis Research, Center of Physiology and Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Veronika TemmlInstitute of Pharmacy/Pharmaceutical Chemistry and Center for Molecular Biosciences Innsbruck (CMBI), University of Innsbruck, Innrain 80-82, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Limei WangDepartment of Pharmacognosy, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Stefan SchwaigerInstitute of Pharmacy/Pharmacognosy and Center for Molecular Biosciences Innsbruck (CMBI), University of Innsbruck, Innrain 80-82, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Elke H HeissDepartment of Pharmacognosy, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Judith M RollingerDepartment of Pharmacognosy, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Daniela SchusterInstitute of Pharmacy/Pharmaceutical Chemistry and Center for Molecular Biosciences Innsbruck (CMBI), University of Innsbruck, Innrain 80-82, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Johannes M BreussInstitute of Vascular Biology and Thrombosis Research, Center of Physiology and Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Valery BochkovInstitute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of Graz, Humboldtstrasse 46/III, 8010 Graz, Austria.
Marko D MihovilovicInstitute of Applied Synthetic Chemistry, Vienna University of Technology, Getreidemarkt 9/163-OC, 1060 Vienna, Austria.
Brigitte KoppDepartment of Pharmacognosy, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Rudolf BauerInstitute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Pharmacognosy, University of Graz, Universitätsplatz 4/I, 8010 Graz, Austria.
Verena M DirschDepartment of Pharmacognosy, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Hermann StuppnerInstitute of Pharmacy/Pharmacognosy and Center for Molecular Biosciences Innsbruck (CMBI), University of Innsbruck, Innrain 80-82, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 25971
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medicinal plants have historically proven their value as a source of molecules with therapeutic potential, and nowadays still represent an important pool for the identification of novel drug leads. In the past decades, pharmaceutical industry focused mainly on libraries of synthetic compounds as drug discovery source. They are comparably easy to produce and resupply, and demonstrate good compatibility with established high throughput screening (HTS) platforms. However, at the same time there has been a declining trend in the number of new drugs reaching the market, raising renewed scientific interest in drug discovery from natural sources, despite of its known challenges. In this survey, a brief outline of historical development is provided together with a comprehensive overview of used approaches and recent developments relevant to plant-derived natural product drug discovery. Associated challenges and major strengths of natural product-based drug discovery are critically discussed. A snapshot of the advanced plant-derived natural products that are currently in actively recruiting clinical trials is also presented. Importantly, the transition of a natural compound from a "screening hit" through a "drug lead" to a "marketed drug" is associated with increasingly challenging demands for compound amount, which often cannot be met by re-isolation from the respective plant sources. In this regard, existing alternatives for resupply are also discussed, including different biotechnology approaches and total organic synthesis. While the intrinsic complexity of natural product-based drug discovery necessitates highly integrated interdisciplinary approaches, the reviewed scientific developments, recent technological advances, and research trends clearly indicate that natural products will be among the most important sources of new drugs also in the future.

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryBiological ProductsDrug IndustryHumansPlants, MedicinalBiological ProductsComputer modelingDrug discoveryEthnopharmacologyMedicineNatural productsOrganic synthesisPharmacologyPhytochemistryPlant biotechnologyPlants

Identifiers

PMID26281720
PMCPMC4748402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.