Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26280486›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2016

Emergency resuscitative thoracotomy performed in European civilian trauma patients with blunt or penetrating injuries: a systematic review.

J K Narvestad, M Meskinfamfard, K Søreide

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Outcomes following resuscitative thoracotomy for abdominal exsanguination, a systematic review.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. A systematic review of 3251 emergency department thoracotomies: is it time for a national database?European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Emergency thoracotomies in traumatic cardiac arrests following blunt trauma - experiences from a German level I trauma center.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023
    Article
  10. Emergency department thoracotomy in a physician-staffed trauma system: the experience of a French Military level-1 trauma center.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022
    Article
  11. Outcomes of the resuscitative and emergency thoracotomy at a Dutch level-one trauma center: are there predictive factors for survival?European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022
    Article
  12. Characteristics and outcome of traumatic cardiac arrest at a level 1 trauma centre over 10 years in Sweden.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Emergency department thoracotomy of severely injured patients: an analysis of the TraumaRegister DGUEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

J K NarvestadDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, POB 8100, 4068, Stavanger, Norway.
M MeskinfamfardDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, POB 8100, 4068, Stavanger, Norway.
K SøreideDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, POB 8100, 4068, Stavanger, Norway. ksoreide@mac.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEmergency resuscitative thoracotomy (ERT) is a lifesaving procedure in selected patients. Indications are still being debated, but outcome in blunt trauma is believed to be poor. Recent reports from European populations, where blunt trauma predominates, have suggested favorable outcome also in blunt trauma. Our aim was to identify all European studies reported over the last decade and compare reported outcomes to existing knowledge.

methodsWe performed a systematic literature search according to PRISMA guidelines (January 1st, 2004 to December 31st, 2014). The "grey literature" was included by searching Google Scholar. Qualitative comparison of studies and outcomes was done.

resultsA total of 8 articles from Europe were included originating from Croatia, Norway (n = 2), Denmark, Iceland, the Netherlands, Scotland, and Switzerland. Of 376 resuscitative thoracotomies, 193 (51.3 %) were for blunt trauma. Male:female distribution was 3.5:1. The collectively reported overall survival was 42.8 % (n = 161), with 25.4 % (49 of 193) blunt trauma and 61.2 % (112 of 183) penetrating injuries. When strictly including those ERTs designated as done in the emergency department for blunt mechanism (n = 139) only, a total of 18 patients survived (12.9 %). Survival after EDTs for penetrating trauma was 41.6 % (37 of 89). Neurological outcome (reported in 5 of 8 studies) reported favorable neurological long-term outcome in the majority of survivors, even after blunt trauma. None referred to Glasgow Outcome Score. Heterogeneity in the studies prevented outcome analyses by formal quantitative meta-analysis.

conclusionThe reported outcome after ERT in European civilian trauma populations is favorable, with one in every four ERTs in the ED surviving. Notably, outcome is at variance with previously reported collective data, in particular for blunt trauma. Multicenter, prospective, observational data are needed to validate the modern role of ERT in blunt trauma.

Indexed as

ResuscitationEuropeHumansOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CareSurvival RateThoracotomyWounds, NonpenetratingWounds, PenetratingBlunt traumaEmergency thoracotomyPenetrating traumaResuscitationSurvival

Identifiers

PMID26280486
PMCPMC5124032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.