ArticleExperimental brain research2015
Temporal and spatial constraints of action effect on sensory binding.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Audiovisual integration in depth: multisensory binding and gain as a function of distance.Experimental brain research · 2018Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Previous studies have shown that asynchrony in perceived changes in the visual attributes of an object is attenuated when the object is the target of a manual reaching action (e.g. Corveleyn et al. in J Vis, 2012. doi: 10.1167/12.11.20 ). In the present study, we examined the temporal and spatial constraints associated with the effect of action on sensory binding. Participants performed a temporal order judgment task which required them to judge which changed first, the position or the colour of a visual stimulus, either while performing a concurrent motor task (manual acquisition of a visual target) or not (perceptual task). In Experiment 1, the fixed-attribute change (colour or position) occurred 0, 250, 500 or 1000 ms following the end of the motor action or the presentation of an auditory cue, while the variable-attribute change (position or colour) occurred randomly within an interval of ±200 ms from the fixed-attribute change. In Experiment 2, the visual stimulus was presented at a distance of 0, 2, 4 or 8 cm from a central fixation cross which was the target in the motor task. The fixed attribute (colour or position) changed 700 ms after an auditory cue (perceptual task) or when the hand reached the visual target (motor task). The variable-attribute change (position or colour) again occurred within an interval of ±200 ms from the fixed-attribute change. Statistical analysis of the point of subjective simultaneity revealed that performing a motor action reduced the perceived temporal asynchrony in the perceptual task, but only when the visual changes occurred less than 500 ms (for the fixed attribute) following movement execution (Exp. 1) and at a distance of less than 4 cm from the movement endpoint (Exp. 2). These results indicate that action-induced sensory binding requires temporal contiguity and spatial congruency between the endpoint of the action and its visual consequences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26280314What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.