Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26280277›Full record

ReviewOncotarget2015

Going viral: a review of replication-selective oncolytic adenoviruses.

Christopher Larson, Bryan Oronsky, Jan Scicinski, Gary R Fanger, Meaghan Stirn, Arnold Oronsky, Tony R Reid

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Oncotarget, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Commentary on oncolytic viruses: past, present, and future.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Christopher LarsonUniversity of California at San Diego (UCSD), Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Bryan OronskyEpicentRx, Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA.
Jan ScicinskiEpicentRx, Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA.
Gary R FangerEpicentRx, Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA.
Meaghan StirnUniversity of California at San Diego (UCSD), Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Arnold OronskyInterWest Partners, Menlo Park, CA, USA.
Tony R ReidUniversity of California at San Diego (UCSD), Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oncolytic viruses have had a tumultuous course, from the initial anecdotal reports of patients having antineoplastic effects after natural viral infections a century ago to the development of current cutting-edge therapies in clinical trials. Adenoviruses have long been the workhorse of virotherapy, and we review both the scientific and the not-so-scientific forces that have shaped the development of these therapeutics from wild-type viral pathogens, turning an old foe into a new friend. After a brief review of the mechanics of viral replication and how it has been modified to engineer tumor selectivity, we give particular attention to ONYX-015, the forerunner of virotherapy with extensive clinical testing that pioneered the field. The findings from those as well as other oncolytic trials have shaped how we now view these viruses, which our immune system has evolved to vigorously attack, as promising immunotherapy agents.

Indexed as

AdenoviridaeAnimalsHumansNeoplasmsOncolytic VirotherapyOncolytic Virusesadenovirusimmunotherapyoncologyoncolytic virus

Identifiers

PMID26280277
PMCPMC4652981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.