Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26280172›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Human Vection Perception Using Inertial Nulling and Certainty Estimation: The Effect of Migraine History.

Mark A Miller, Catherine J O'Leary, Paul D Allen, Benjamin T Crane

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mark A MillerSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, 14642, United States of America.
Catherine J O'LearySchool of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, 14642, United States of America.
Paul D AllenDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of Rochester, 601 Elmwood Ave, Box 629, Rochester, NY, 14642, United States of America; Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, University of Rochester, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Box 629, Rochester, NY, 14642, United States of America.
Benjamin T CraneDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of Rochester, 601 Elmwood Ave, Box 629, Rochester, NY, 14642, United States of America; Department of Bioengineering, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, 14642, United States of America; Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, University of Rochester, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Box 629, Rochester, NY, 14642, United States of America.

Funding

Technology and Comp CoreP30DC005409 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI PAIGE, GARY D · 2002 to 2012
$4.3M
Multi-modal vestibular perceptionR01DC013580 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI CRANE, BENJAMIN T · 2015 to 2024
$3.5M
Training in Hearing, Balance, and Spatial OrientationT32DC009974 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI NEWLANDS, SHAWN D. · 2010 to 2014
$1.3M
Visual and Vestibular Percepts of MotionK23DC011298 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI CRANE, BENJAMIN T · 2011 to 2015
$1.1M
NIDCD NIH HHS K23 DC011298NIDCD NIH HHS P30 DC005409NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013580NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC009974
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vection is an illusory perception of self-motion that can occur when visual motion fills the majority of the visual field. This study examines the effect of the duration of visual field movement (VFM) on the perceived strength of self-motion using an inertial nulling (IN) and a magnitude estimation technique based on the certainty that motion occurred (certainty estimation, CE). These techniques were then used to investigate the association between migraine diagnosis and the strength of perceived vection. Visual star-field stimuli consistent with either looming or receding motion were presented for 1, 4, 8 or 16s. Subjects reported the perceived direction of self-motion during the final 1s of the stimulus. For the IN method, an inertial nulling motion was delivered during this final 1s of the visual stimulus, and subjects reported the direction of perceived self-motion during this final second. The magnitude of inertial motion was varied adaptively to determine the point of subjective equality (PSE) at which forward or backward responses were equally likely. For the CE trials the same range of VFM was used but without inertial motion and subjects rated their certainty of motion on a scale of 0-100. PSE determined with the IN technique depended on direction and duration of visual motion and the CE technique showed greater certainty of perceived vection with longer VFM duration. A strong correlation between CE and IN techniques was present for the 8s stimulus. There was appreciable between-subject variation in both CE and IN techniques and migraine was associated with significantly increased perception of self-motion by CE and IN at 8 and 16s. Together, these results suggest that vection may be measured by both CE and IN techniques with good correlation. The results also suggest that susceptibility to vection may be higher in subjects with a history of migraine.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHumansMaleMigraine DisordersMotionMotion PerceptionMovementVisual FieldsVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID26280172
PMCPMC4539192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.